Fair courts, prosecutorial and law enforcement authorities

2.1. Fair courts, prosecutorial and law enforcement authorities

problems 7
expected strategic
results 29
measures 98
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 28.04.2025
measures, the implementation of which as of 31.12.2024
29 10 23 4 32
98
Implemented Partially implemented In progress Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 39 ( 39.8%)
Якісний рівень досягнення ОСР
1 5 17.2%
High
2 6.9%
Middle
22 75.9%
Low
 
Середня оцінка досягнення ОСР, %
24.4
%
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
Problems
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — evaluation of achievement of ESR, % —
2.1.1. There is a social trend towards a declining level of trust in the justice system. The law does not define integrity as a qualification requirement for members of the High Council of Justice and the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
50%
6
40.0
%
ESR 2.1.1.1.
0%
70.0%
ESR 2.1.1.2.
66.7%
20.0%
ESR 2.1.1.3.
50%
30.0%
2.1.2. Procedures for qualification evaluation of judges and competitive selection procedures need to be improved and clear and predictable criteria (indicators) of integrity and professional ethics should be developed. Integrity and professional ethics as standard requirements for judges are not sufficiently implemented in practice, and the evaluation of conformity to these requirements is not always transparent and predictable
73.9%
23
44.5
%
ESR 2.1.2.1.
100%
76.0%
ESR 2.1.2.2.
0%
25.0%
ESR 2.1.2.3.
57.1%
20.0%
ESR 2.1.2.4.
85.7%
57.0%
2.1.3. Lack of effective mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and responding to established facts of influence, pressure on judges and interference in their activities
18.2%
11
16.0
%
ESR 2.1.3.1.
0%
26.0%
ESR 2.1.3.2.
33.3%
0.0%
ESR 2.1.3.3.
25%
70.0%
ESR 2.1.3.4.
0%
0.0%
ESR 2.1.3.5.
0%
0.0%
ESR 2.1.3.6.
0%
0.0%
2.1.4. Presence of corruption risks attributable to gaps and flaws of legislation in the system of justice
22.2%
27
18.1
%
ESR 2.1.4.1.
0%
0.0%
ESR 2.1.4.2.
37.5%
10.0%
ESR 2.1.4.3.
0%
0.0%
ESR 2.1.4.4.
20%
7.0%
ESR 2.1.4.5.
28.6%
10.0%
ESR 2.1.4.6.
0%
0.0%
ESR 2.1.4.7.
0%
100%
2.1.5. Internal administrative processes in prosecutorial authorities are not always transparent and effective
25%
4
23.3
%
ESR 2.1.5.1.
0%
0.0%
ESR 2.1.5.2.
50%
0.0%
ESR 2.1.5.3.
0%
70.0%
2.1.6. Lack of an effective model of appointment to positions, remuneration, career promotion, and review of disciplinary complaints within the system of the National Police
39.1%
23
27.3
%
ESR 2.1.6.1.
42.9%
22.0%
ESR 2.1.6.2.
33.3%
30.0%
ESR 2.1.6.3.
42.9%
30.0%
2.1.7. The need to improve the process of independent evaluation of the performance of anticorruption agencies and develop mechanisms for holding them liable
25%
4
11.7
%
ESR 2.1.7.1.
0%
0.0%
ESR 2.1.7.2.
0%
0.0%
ESR 2.1.7.3.
33.3%
35.0%