ESR
2.1.3.2. The list and grounds for bringing a judge to disciplinary liability and the kinds of liability have been clarified in a way that allows judges to predict their behavior, in particular, the signs of disciplinary offenses that tarnish the title of judge or undermine the authority of justice have been more clearly defined, and the mechanisms for disciplinary investigation and consideration of disciplinary cases have been improved and simplified
Problem solving:
2.1.3. Lack of effective mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and responding to established facts of influence, pressure on judges and interference in their activities
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.07.2024 -
31.01.2025
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
3
1
2
In progress
Not implemented
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
0%
2
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
0%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
| № | Name of the measure | The main implementer | Co-implementors | Performance indicator | Monitoring results (latest) | Статус |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1.3.2.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to update the list of grounds for bringing a judge to disciplinary liability in keeping with the principle of legal certainty and in accordance with GRECO recommendations | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | Міністерство юстиції України, Вища рада правосуддя | The draft law has been submitted to the Parliament of Ukraine. |
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
|
|
| 2 | 2.1.3.2.2 Preparing and publicizing an analytical report on the expediency of continued improvement and simplification of procedures of disciplinary proceedings against judges | Ministry of Justice of Ukraine | The analytical report has been prepared and made public. |
The measure has not been implemented
|
||
| 3 | 2.1.3.2.3 Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report indicated in subclause 2.1.3.2.2 with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community | Ministry of Justice of Ukraine | The conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report have been discussed with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community. |
The measure has not been implemented
|
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 3
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 3
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
* - Вага - програмне значення індикатора в ОСР| № | Indicators | Weight* (%) | Assessment of achievement | Evaluation rationale | Data source/information manager | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| for the year 2024 | for the year 2025 | |||||
| 1 | a law has taken effect, which has updated the list of grounds for bringing a judge to disciplinary liability in keeping with the principle of legal certainty and in accordance with GRECO recommendations. | 55% | 0% | За результатами проведення І циклу поточної (щорічної) оцінки ефективності реалізації Антикорупційної стратегії на 2021-2025 роки та Державної антикорупційної програми на 2023-2025 роки встановлено, що індикатор 1 очікуваного стратегічного результату 2.1.3.2 не досягнуто з огляду на те, що протягом оцінюваного періоду не набрав чинності закон, яким уточнено перелік підстав та підстави для притягне... -> |
Official printed publications Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine |
|
| 2 | an analytical report on the expediency of continued improvement and simplification of procedures of disciplinary proceedings against judges has been made public. | 15% | 0% | За результатами проведення І циклу поточної (щорічної) оцінки ефективності реалізації Антикорупційної стратегії на 2021-2025 роки та Державної антикорупційної програми на 2023-2025 роки встановлено, що індикатор 2 очікуваного стратегічного результату 2.1.3.2 не досягнуто з огляду на те, що за інформацією, наданою Міністерством юстиції України, аналітичне дослідження щодо доцільності подальшого удо... -> | Official website of the Ministry of Justice | |
| 3 |
at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that: a) the grounds for disciplinary liability of judges are defined sufficiently clearly and understandably in order to enable judges to predict the consequences of their conduct and actions (10 percent); b) the updated grounds for disciplinary liability of judges ensure full alignment with GRECO recommendations (5 percent); c) the mechanism of disciplinary proceedings is generally or for the most part efficient and effective (15 percent). |
30% | 0% | У межах проведення І циклу поточної (щорічної) оцінки індикатор 3 очікуваного стратегічного результату 2.1.3.2. не підлягає оцінюванню, оскільки таке експертне опитування не проведене. ... -> | Results of the expert survey organized by the National Agency | |