ESR
2.1.3.4. The grounds and mechanisms for discontinuing disciplinary proceedings have been improved, in particular, a mechanism for discontinuing the disciplinary case against a judge in case of their resignation after the initiation of the disciplinary case against them has been introduced
Problem solving:
2.1.3. Lack of effective mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and responding to established facts of influence, pressure on judges and interference in their activities
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.06.2023 -
31.07.2025
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
1
1
In progress
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
0%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
| № | Name of the measure | The main implementer | Co-implementors | Performance indicator | Monitoring results (latest) | Статус |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
2.1.3.4.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law that: 1) prohibits dismissing a judge from their position following their retirement until disciplinary proceedings against this judge have been finalized; 2) defines the grounds for suspending the retirement and revoking the status of a judge if the retired judge has behaved in a way that is incompatible with the title of a judge; 3) establishes the procedure for examining the matter of suspending the retirement and revoking the status of a judge if the retired judge has behaved in a way that is incompatible with the title of a judge. |
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine | The draft law has been submitted to the Parliament of Ukraine. |
There is no progress in the implementation of the measure
|
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 2
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 2
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
A law has taken effect, which: a) prohibits dismissing a judge from their position following their retirement until disciplinary proceedings against this judge have been finalized (20 percent); b) defines the grounds for suspending the retirement and revoking the status of a judge if the retired judge has behaved in a way that is incompatible with the title of a judge (30 percent); c) establishes the procedure for examining the matter of suspending the retirement and revoking the status of a judge if the retired judge has behaved in a way that is incompatible with the title of a judge (20 percent). |
70% |
| 2 |
at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that: a) judge are not dismissed from their positions following their retirement until all disciplinary proceedings against this judge have been finalized (10 percent); b) the grounds for suspending the retirement and revoking the status of a judge if the retired judge has behaved in a way that is incompatible with the title of a judge are clearly defined and predictable (10 percent); c) the procedure for examining the matter of suspending the retirement and revoking the status of a judge if the retired judge has behaved in a way that is incompatible with the title of a judge ensures the unbiased and impartial examination of this matter (10 percent). |
30% |