ESR
2.1.3.5. An effective mechanism has been introduced for verifying the legality of the origin of a judge’s property; judges who have violated the obligation to prove the legality of the source of their property have been dismissed pursuant to Article 126 of the Constitution of Ukraine
Problem solving:
2.1.3. Lack of effective mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and responding to established facts of influence, pressure on judges and interference in their activities
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.01.2025 -
31.12.2025
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
1
1
Not started
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
0%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 2
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 2
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
* - Вага - програмне значення індикатора в ОСР| № | Indicators | Weight* (%) | Assessment of achievement | Evaluation rationale | Data source/information manager | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| for the year 2024 | for the year 2025 | |||||
| 1 |
A law has taken effect, which: a) institutes a separate procedure for checking the legitimacy of the sources of origin of the judge’s assets (outside the scope of the disciplinary proceedings), which will be carried out by the National Agency (25 percent); b) institutes a separate procedure by which the High Council of Justice reviews petitions for the dismissal of the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets (25 percent); c) institutes a separate procedure by which the judge or plaintiff (complainant) can appeal decisions, actions, or omissions to act as part of the process of verifying the legitimacy of the origin of the judge’s assets, and dismiss the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets (20 percent). |
70% | 0% | За результатами проведення І циклу поточної (щорічної) оцінки ефективності реалізації Антикорупційної стратегії на 2021-2025 роки та Державної антикорупційної програми на 2023-2025 роки встановлено, що індикатор 1 очікуваного стратегічного результату 2.1.3.5. не досягнуто з огляду на те, що протягом оцінюваного періоду не набрав чинності закон, яким було б забезпечено досягнення субіндикаторів а-в... -> |
Official printed publications Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine |
|
| 2 |
at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that: a) the instituted separate procedure for checking the legitimacy of the sources of origin of the judge’s assets (outside the scope of the disciplinary proceedings) is fully or for the most part effective and efficient (10 percent); b) the instituted separate procedure by which the High Council of Justice reviews petitions for the dismissal of the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets is fully or for the most part effective and efficient (10 percent); c) the instituted separate procedure by which the judge or plaintiff (complainant) can appeal decisions, actions, or omissions to act as part of the process of verifying the legitimacy of the origin of the judge’s assets, and dismiss the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets is fully or for the most part effective and efficient (10 percent). |
30% | 0% | У межах проведення І циклу поточної (щорічної) оцінки індикатор 2 очікуваного стратегічного результату 2.1.3.5. не підлягає оцінюванню, оскільки таке експертне опитування не проведене. ... -> | Results of the expert survey organized by the National Agency | |