Feedback from the public

ESR

2.1.3.5. An effective mechanism has been introduced for verifying the legality of the origin of a judge’s property; judges who have violated the obligation to prove the legality of the source of their property have been dismissed pursuant to Article 126 of the Constitution of Ukraine

Problem solving:

2.1.3. Lack of effective mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and responding to established facts of influence, pressure on judges and interference in their activities

Deadlines for all measures within ESR

01.01.2025 - 31.12.2025

Implementation of SACP measures within ESR

Total number of measures – 1

Not started

Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers

National Agency on Corruption Prevention

Summarized general information on Measures

№	Name of the measure	The main implementer	Co-implementors	Performance indicator	Monitoring results (latest)	Статус
1	2.1.3.5.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law that: 1) institutes a separate procedure for checking the legitimacy of the sources of origin of the judge’s assets (outside the scope of the disciplinary proceedings), which will be carried out by the National Agency; 2) institutes a separate procedure by which the High Council of Justice would review petitions for the dismissal of the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets; 3) institutes a separate procedure by which the judge or plaintiff (complainant) can appeal decisions, actions, or omissions to act as part of the process of verifying the legitimacy of the origin of the judge’s assets, and dismiss the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets.	National Agency on Corruption Prevention		The draft law has been submitted to the Parliament of Ukraine.		Not started

Indicators of achievement of ESR

Total number of indicators – 2

Indicators fully achieved – 0

Partially achieved indicators – 0

Indicators with a score of 0% – 2

Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators

№	Indicators	Weight (%)
№	Indicators	Weight (%)	1	A law has taken effect, which: a) institutes a separate procedure for checking the legitimacy of the sources of origin of the judge’s assets (outside the scope of the disciplinary proceedings), which will be carried out by the National Agency (25 percent); b) institutes a separate procedure by which the High Council of Justice reviews petitions for the dismissal of the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets (25 percent); c) institutes a separate procedure by which the judge or plaintiff (complainant) can appeal decisions, actions, or omissions to act as part of the process of verifying the legitimacy of the origin of the judge’s assets, and dismiss the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets (20 percent).	70%
2	at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that: a) the instituted separate procedure for checking the legitimacy of the sources of origin of the judge’s assets (outside the scope of the disciplinary proceedings) is fully or for the most part effective and efficient (10 percent); b) the instituted separate procedure by which the High Council of Justice reviews petitions for the dismissal of the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets is fully or for the most part effective and efficient (10 percent); c) the instituted separate procedure by which the judge or plaintiff (complainant) can appeal decisions, actions, or omissions to act as part of the process of verifying the legitimacy of the origin of the judge’s assets, and dismiss the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets is fully or for the most part effective and efficient (10 percent).	30%

ESR