ESR
2.1.3.5. An effective mechanism has been introduced for verifying the legality of the origin of a judge’s property; judges who have violated the obligation to prove the legality of the source of their property have been dismissed pursuant to Article 126 of the Constitution of Ukraine
Problem solving:
2.1.3. Lack of effective mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and responding to established facts of influence, pressure on judges and interference in their activities
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.01.2024 -
31.07.2024
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
1
1
Not implemented
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
0%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 2
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 2
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
A law has taken effect, which: a) institutes a separate procedure for checking the legitimacy of the sources of origin of the judge’s assets (outside the scope of the disciplinary proceedings), which will be carried out by the National Agency (25 percent); b) institutes a separate procedure by which the High Council of Justice reviews petitions for the dismissal of the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets (25 percent); c) institutes a separate procedure by which the judge or plaintiff (complainant) can appeal decisions, actions, or omissions to act as part of the process of verifying the legitimacy of the origin of the judge’s assets, and dismiss the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets (20 percent). |
70% |
| 2 |
at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that: a) the instituted separate procedure for checking the legitimacy of the sources of origin of the judge’s assets (outside the scope of the disciplinary proceedings) is fully or for the most part effective and efficient (10 percent); b) the instituted separate procedure by which the High Council of Justice reviews petitions for the dismissal of the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets is fully or for the most part effective and efficient (10 percent); c) the instituted separate procedure by which the judge or plaintiff (complainant) can appeal decisions, actions, or omissions to act as part of the process of verifying the legitimacy of the origin of the judge’s assets, and dismiss the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets is fully or for the most part effective and efficient (10 percent). |
30% |