Feedback from the public

ESR

2.3.5.1. Unjustified influence of subjective factors during the exercise of powers by officials of the tax authorities has been prevented

Problem solving:

2.3.5. Excessive scope of discretionary powers of employees of tax authorities

Deadlines for all measures within ESR

01.03.2023 - 30.11.2023

Implementation of SACP measures within ESR

Total number of measures – 6
3 2 1
Implemented Partially implemented Not implemented

Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers

Ministry of Finance of Ukraine

100%
3

State Tax Service of Ukraine

100%
2

Ministry of Economy of Ukraine

0%
1

Summarized general information on Measures

Name of the measure The main implementer Co-implementors Performance indicator Monitoring results (latest) Статус
1 2.3.5.1.1 Developing the draft order on amendments to the Procedure of Operation of the Electronic Workspace, approved by the order of the Ministry of Finance dated July 14, 2017, No. 637 pertaining to:
a) receipt by a taxpayer of additional fiscal information (information about inclusion in / removal from the list of taxpayers meeting the criteria of a taxpayer with a high risk level, information about suspended registration of tax invoices / reconciliation payments, etc.) about other taxpayers with the prior consent of such individuals, in the form of a document of an established format, in electronic form with the application of the qualified electronic seal of the controlling authority;
b) expansion of services available in the electronic taxpayer workspace by launching new electronic services that allow, among other things, correspondence through the electronic workspace between the controlling authorities and taxpayers that submit reports in electronic form and/or passed electronic identification online in the electronic workspace and applied to receive documents through the electronic workspace.
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine Державна податкова служба України The draft order has been drafted and publicized for a public discussion.
The measure was implemented on time, but partially
Partially implemented
2 2.3.5.1.2 Clearing the draft order indicated in subclause 2.3.5.1.1 with the concerned authorities and reworking the draft (if necessary) Ministry of Finance of Ukraine Державна податкова служба України The public discussion has been conducted and its results have been made public.
The measure was implemented on time, but partially
Partially implemented
3 2.3.5.1.3 Supporting the state registration of the order indicated in subclause 2.3.5.1.1 with the Ministry of Justice Ministry of Finance of Ukraine The order has been issued, published, its state registration has been completed, and it has been included in the Unified State Register of Normative Legal Acts.
The measure was implemented on time and in full
Implemented
4 2.3.5.1.4 Developing software for expansion of the functionality of the electronic workspace by launching the services indicated in subclause 2.3.5.1.1 State Tax Service of Ukraine The software has been developed.
The measure was implemented on time and in full
Implemented
5 2.3.5.1.5 Putting the functionality indicated in subclause 2.3.5.1.4 into commercial operation State Tax Service of Ukraine The functionality has been put into commercial operation.
The measure was implemented on time and in full
Implemented
6 2.3.5.1.6 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine the draft laws on amendments to the Tax Code of Ukraine, the Customs Code of Ukraine, the Budget Code of Ukraine, and the Law of Ukraine On Collection and Accounting of the Single Premium Towards Compulsory State Social Insurance, which provide for:
1) implementation of comprehensive measures that would guarantee fair competition among taxpayers;
2) ensuring that the government’s guarantees for taxpayers are honored beyond the influence of the subjective factor of officials and the associated corruption risks;
3) fostering the improvement of indexes of business expectations and economic freedom of entrepreneurs.
Ministry of Economy of Ukraine Міністерство фінансів України, Державна митна служба України, Державна податкова служба України, Національний банк України, Бюро економічної безпеки України The draft laws have been submitted to the Parliament of Ukraine.
The measure has not been implemented
Not implemented

Indicators of achievement of ESR

Total number of indicators – 3

Indicators fully achieved – 0

Partially achieved indicators – 0

Indicators with a score of 0% – 3

Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators

Indicators Weight (%)
1 An order on amendments to the Procedure of Operation of the Electronic Workspace, approved by the order of the Ministry of Finance dated July 14, 2017, No. 637, has taken effect, which pertains to:
a) receipt by a taxpayer of additional fiscal information (information about inclusion in / removal from the list of taxpayers meeting the criteria of a taxpayer with a high risk level, information about suspended registration of tax invoices / reconciliation payments, etc.) about other taxpayers with the prior consent of such individuals, in the form of a document of an established format, in electronic form with the application of the qualified electronic seal of the controlling authority (25 percent);
b) expansion of services available in the electronic taxpayer workspace by launching new electronic services that allow, among other things, correspondence through the electronic workspace between the controlling authorities and taxpayers that submit reports in electronic form and/or passed electronic identification online in the electronic workspace and applied to receive documents through the electronic workspace (25 percent).
50%
2 The functionality of the electronic workspace has been expanded by implementing the services indicated in subclause 1 of clause 2.3.5.1. 40%
3 the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that:
a) more than 75 percent of experts on the regulation of the economy and business evaluate the degree of implementation of automated services in the operations of the tax authorities as high or very high (10 percent);
b) more than 50 percent of experts on the regulation of the economy and business evaluate the degree of implementation of automated services in the operations of the tax authorities as high or very high (7 percent);
c) more than 25 percent of experts on the regulation of the economy and business evaluate the degree of implementation of automated services in the operations of the tax authorities as high or very high (4 percent).
10%

Key sources of assessment:

Additional sources of information: