ESR
2.4.1.4. At all business entities for which the establishment of supervisory boards is mandatory, such boards are empowered to control the implementation of internal anticorruption measures. Supervisory boards are formed in a competitive and transparent manner
Problem solving:
2.4.1. The existing governance model at public sector entities is ineffective, resulting in losses and corruption
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.03.2023 -
31.12.2025
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
2
1
1
Partially implemented
Not started
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
Ministry of Economy of Ukraine
100%
1
State authorities — subjects of management of state-owned objects
0%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 3
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 3
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
A law has taken effect, which: a) defines a competitive and transparent procedure for forming supervisory boards of state-owned enterprises (8 percent); b) defines requirements for independent members of supervisory boards of state-owned enterprises (8 percent); c) defines the functional duties of members of supervisory boards of state-owned enterprises (8 percent); d) provides for the need to develop a methodology for defining clear and transparent performance indicators for supervisory boards of state-owned enterprises (8 percent); e) defines an exhaustive list of grounds for termination of the powers of members of supervisory boards at state-owned enterprises, and their liability for improper discharge of their duties (8 percent). |
40% |
| 2 |
Supervisory boards have been formed at state-owned enterprises for which the creation of supervisory boards is mandated: a) supervisory boards have been formed at 100 percent of state-owned enterprises (35 percent); b) supervisory boards have been formed at 90 percent of state-owned enterprises (28 percent); c) supervisory boards have been formed at 80 percent of state-owned enterprises (21 percent); d) supervisory boards have been formed at 70 percent of state-owned enterprises (14 percent); e) supervisory boards have been formed at 60 percent of state-owned enterprises (7 percent). |
35% |
| 3 |
at least 80 percent of experts on the regulation of the economy and businesses estimate that: a) the legislatively prescribed procedures for establishing supervisory boards of state-owned enterprises completely or mostly ensure the independence of supervisory boards (10 percent); b) the legislatively prescribed requirements for the procedure for establishing supervisory boards of state-owned enterprises completely or mostly ensure the independence of supervisory boards (15 percent). |
25% |