Feedback from the public

ESR

2.4.2.1. Instruments have been put in place to prevent the negative impact of privatization authorities and organizers of privatization auctions on the number of bidders and competition.

Problem solving:

2.4.2. Insufficient transparency of privatization procedures and failure by buyers to comply with the terms of the sale of the privatized asset

Deadlines for all measures within ESR

01.03.2023 - 31.03.2024

Implementation of SACP measures within ESR

Total number of measures – 2
1 1
Implemented In progress

Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers

Ministry of Economy of Ukraine

0%
1

State Property Fund of Ukraine

100%
1

Summarized general information on Measures

Indicators of achievement of ESR

Total number of indicators – 4

Indicators fully achieved – 0

Partially achieved indicators – 0

Indicators with a score of 0% – 4

Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators

Indicators Weight (%)
1 The law that updates the list of state-owned facilities that are not subject to privatization has taken effect. 30%
2 The Procedure for Holding Electronic Auctions to Sell Assets of Major Privatization and Choosing the Winning Bidder Based on the Outcome of the Electronic Auction has been approved. 20%
3 The average number of bidders in privatization auctions (per privatization lot) is:
a) no less than six (30 percent);
b) no less than five (25 percent);
c) no less than four (20 percent);
d) no less than three (15 percent);
e) no less than two (10 percent).
30%
4 at least 80 percent of experts on the regulation of the economy and businesses estimate that:
a) the procedures for transferring assets to the State Property Fund and other privatization authorities are fully or mostly optimal and efficient (4 percent);
b) in practice, the transfer of assets to the State Property Fund and other privatization authorities always or mostly takes place without unreasonable delays (3 percent);
c) the legislation has been completely or mostly rid of provisions that caused a negative impact of privatization authorities and organizers of privatization auctions on the number of bidders and competition (3 percent);
d) in practice, the negative impact of privatization authorities and organizers of privatization auctions on the number of bidders and competition is always or mostly absent (4 percent);
e) the powers of the State Property Fund are fully or mostly sufficient for effective and efficient preparation of assets for privatization (3 percent);
f) privatization procedures always or mostly make it possible to attract a sufficient number of bidders and ensure an appropriate level of fair competition among them (3 percent).
20%

Key sources of assessment:

Additional sources of information: