Feedback from the public

ESR

2.4.4.8. The law on administrative fees has been adopted, which defines the concept, kinds, and functions of administrative fees, the principles by which they are charged, paid, and used

Problem solving:

2.4.4. A high level of tolerance of corruption in the private sector of the economy

Deadlines for all measures within ESR

01.01.2024 - 31.10.2024

Implementation of SACP measures within ESR

Total number of measures – 4
4
Not started

Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers

Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine

0%
4

Summarized general information on Measures

Name of the measure The main implementer Co-implementors Performance indicator Monitoring results (latest) Статус
1 2.4.4.8.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law on the administrative fee that would define:
1) the concept, kinds, and functions of the administrative fee;
2) the principles of charging, paying, and using the administrative fee;
3) the unified criteria for charging and not charging fees for administrative services, particularly the need to establish which services should be paid for exclusively by law;
4) the minimum amount of the administrative fee;
5) specific and balanced amounts of the administrative fee for key administrative services in accordance with the relevant list;
6) the possibility of reducing or increasing the amount of the administrative fee bearing in mind the form and timeframe of the administrative service.
Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine Міністерство фінансів України, Міністерство юстиції України The draft law has been submitted to the Parliament of Ukraine.
Implementation of the measure has not started
Not started
2 2.4.4.8.2 Developing the draft of the Procedure for compiling the list of expenditures for the provision of an administrative service (prime cost) and using it to determine the amount of the administrative fee Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine The draft Procedure has been developed and publicized for a public discussion. Not started
3 2.4.4.8.3 Holding a public discussion of the draft procedure indicated in subclause 2.4.4.8.2, and ensuring its revision (if needed), approval, and submission for state registration Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine The public discussion has been conducted and its results have been made public. Not started
4 2.4.4.8.4 Supporting the state registration of the draft order indicated in subclause 2.4.4.8.2 and its official publication Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine Міністерство юстиції України The procedure has been registered and made public. Not started

Indicators of achievement of ESR

Total number of indicators – 3

Indicators fully achieved – 0

Partially achieved indicators – 0

Indicators with a score of 0% – 3

Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators

Indicators Weight (%)
1 The law on administrative fees has taken effect, which defines:
a) the concept, kinds, and functions of the administrative fee (5 percent);
b) the principles of charging, paying, and using the administrative fee (5 percent);
c) the unified criteria for charging and not charging fees for all administrative services, particularly the need to establish which services should be paid for exclusively by law (5 percent);
d) the minimum amount of the administrative fee (5 percent);
e) specific and balanced amounts of the administrative fee for key administrative services in accordance with the relevant list (25 percent);
f) the possibility of reducing or increasing the amount of the administrative fee bearing in mind the form and timeframe of the administrative service (5 percent).
50%
2 In pursuance of the law on the administrative fee, the Procedure for compiling the list of expenditures for the provision of an administrative service (prime cost) and using it to determine the amount of the administrative fee has been approved. 30%
3 the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that:
a) more than 75 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the legal policy evaluate the quality of legal regulation indicated in subclauses 1 and 2 of clause 2.4.4.8 as high or very high (20 percent);
b) more than 50 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the legal policy evaluate the quality of legal regulation indicated in subclauses 1 and 2 of clause 2.4.4.8 as high or very high (15 percent);
c) more than 25 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the legal policy evaluate the quality of legal regulation indicated in subclauses 1 and 2 of clause 2.4.4.8 as high or very high (5 percent).
20%

Key sources of assessment:

Additional sources of information: