ESR
1.3.1.2. Improvements have been made to legislative procedures for reporting a conflict of interest and the mechanisms used to resolve it, particularly in relation to officials who do not have an immediate superior or occupy elective positions
Problem solving:
1.3.1. Flaws of legislation and the lack of effective risk-based mechanisms for detecting conflicts of interest limit the ability to minimize corruption by preventing and resolving conflicts of interest.
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.07.2023 -
30.04.2024
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
1
1
In progress
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
0%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 2
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 2
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
The law has taken effect, which: a) establishes requirements with respect to the form of the conflict of interest statement (17 percent); b) provides for the algorithm of actions of the immediate superior of the person who has a conflict of interest, where the superior has no powers to apply a specific method of external resolution of the conflict of interest (such as transfer or dismissal) (17 percent); c) aligns the provisions of the Law, specifically with respect to the person who must be informed about the conflict of interest and the person who must resolve the conflict of interest (17 percent); d) improves the mechanism of resolution of the conflict of interest for individuals who do not have an immediate superior, particularly those occupying elective positions (17 percent); c) extend the term for making a decision on the resolution of the conflict of interest (17 percent). |
85% |
| 2 |
the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that: a) more than 75 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of legal regulation implemented by the law indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.1.2 as high or very high (15 percent); b) more than 50 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of legal regulation implemented by the law indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.1.2 as high or very high (10 percent); c) more than 25 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of legal regulation implemented by the law indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.1.2 as high or very high (5 percent). |
15% |