ESR
1.3.4.2. Measures for holding managers liable for failing to respond as mandated by law to instances of gross violations of anticorruption legislation have been implemented
Problem solving:
1.3.4. There are no legislative standards for ethical conduct of MPs, members of local councils, and elected local self-government officials. The existing rules of ethical conduct are not properly implemented due to the failure of managers to exercise their powers to hold violators of such rules liable.
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.03.2024 -
31.10.2024
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
1
1
In progress
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
0%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
| № | Name of the measure | The main implementer | Co-implementors | Performance indicator | Monitoring results (latest) | Статус |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3.4.2.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to establish a mechanism for holding liable all categories of managers for failing to respond to confirmed facts of gross violations of anticorruption legislation by their subordinates | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | The draft law has been submitted to the Parliament of Ukraine. |
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
|
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 2
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 2
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A last has taken effect, which establishes mechanisms for holding liable all categories of managers for failing to respond to confirmed facts of gross violations of anticorruption legislation by their subordinates. | 90% |
| 2 |
the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that: a) more than 75 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of legal regulation implemented by the law indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.4.2 as high or very high (10 percent); b) more than 50 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of legal regulation implemented by the law indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.4.2 as high or very high (6 percent); c) more than 25 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of legal regulation implemented by the law indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.4.2 as high or very high (3 percent). |
10% |