ESR
1.3.4.3. The monitoring of the effectiveness of measures towards holding members of the Parliament of Ukraine, members of local councils, and elected local self-government officials liable for violations of the ethical code of conduct has been ensured
Problem solving:
1.3.4. There are no legislative standards for ethical conduct of MPs, members of local councils, and elected local self-government officials. The existing rules of ethical conduct are not properly implemented due to the failure of managers to exercise their powers to hold violators of such rules liable.
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
Summarized general information on Measures
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 3
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 3
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The annual report on the findings of the monitoring by the National Agency of the effectiveness of efforts to hold accountable the Parliament Members of Ukraine, members of local councils, and elected officials of local self-government bodies for violations of rules of ethical conduct has been made public (with recommendations on ways to improve the legislation and/or practices of its enforcement). | 50% |
| 2 | The law developed according to the recommendations provided in the annual report indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.4.3 has taken effect, which provides for improvements to the grounds and mechanisms for holding accountable the Parliament Members of Ukraine, members of local councils, and elected officials of local self-government bodies for violations of rules of ethical conduct (if necessary). | 40% |
| 3 |
the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that: a) more than 75 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of implementation of measures involving the prosecution of the liable entities as high or very high (10 percent); b) more than 50 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of implementation of measures involving the prosecution of the liable entities as high or very high (6 percent); c) more than 25 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of implementation of measures involving the prosecution of the liable entities as high or very high (3 percent). |
10% |