ESR
1.4.1.2. The list of declarants has been revised and updated taking into account the results of corruption risk assessment conducted by the National Agency
Problem solving:
1.4.1. Legislative regulation that categorizes specific individuals as declarants is flawed, which limits the potential of financial control instruments.
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.03.2023 -
30.09.2025
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
4
1
3
In progress
Not started
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
0%
4
Summarized general information on Measures
| № | Name of the measure | The main implementer | Co-implementors | Performance indicator | Monitoring results (latest) | Статус |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.4.1.2.1 Developing the draft Corruption Risk Assessment Methodology | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | The draft Methodology has been developed. |
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
|
||
| 2 | 1.4.1.2.2 Holding a public discussion of the draft Corruption Risk Assessment Methodology | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | The public discussion has been conducted and its results have been made public. | |||
| 3 | 1.4.1.2.3 Final revision (if needed) and approval of the Corruption Risk Assessment Methodology | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | The Methodology has been approved. | |||
| 4 | 1.4.1.2.4 Conducting an assessment of corruption risks and using its findings to revise the list of individuals obligated to submit a declaration of a person authorized to carry out the functions of state or local self-government | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | The assessment of corruption risks has been conducted. |
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 3
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 3
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A corruption risk assessment methodology has been developed with the objective of compiling the list of individuals obligated to submit a declaration of a person authorized to carry out the functions of state or local self-government. | 60% |
| 2 | The findings of corruption risk assessment have been used to compile the list of individuals obligated to submit a declaration of a person authorized to carry out the functions of state or local self-government. | 20% |
| 3 |
The results of a survey of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy have demonstrated that: a) more than 75 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of corruption risk assessment conducted per subclause 2 of clause 1.4.1.2 as high or very high (20 percent); b) more than 50 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of corruption risk assessment conducted per subclause 2 of clause 1.4.1.2 as high or very high (15 percent); c) more than 25 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of corruption risk assessment conducted per subclause 2 of clause 1.4.1.2 as high or very high (10 percent). |
20% |