ESR
2.1.2.1. The High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the High Council of Justice, together with the bodies involved in the assessment, judicial self-government bodies and the public have developed and implemented clear and predictable criteria (indicators) of integrity and professional ethics for the qualification assessment of judges and selection of new judges
Problem solving:
2.1.2. Procedures for qualification evaluation of judges and competitive selection procedures need to be improved and clear and predictable criteria (indicators) of integrity and professional ethics should be developed. Integrity and professional ethics as standard requirements for judges are not sufficiently implemented in practice, and the evaluation of conformity to these requirements is not always transparent and predictable
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.03.2023 -
30.11.2024
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
7
4
3
Implemented
In progress
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
High Council of Justice
40%
5
Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
100%
1
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
100%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
| № | Name of the measure | The main implementer | Co-implementors | Performance indicator | Monitoring results (latest) | Статус |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1.2.1.1 Conducting (and publishing the findings of) an analytical study of the practices of evaluation of judges for conformity to the criteria of integrity and professional ethics and evaluation of candidates for conformity to the criterion of integrity by the High Qualification Commission of Judges, the Public Council on Integrity, and the Public Council of International Experts | Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine | The report on the findings of the analysis of the practices of evaluation of judges for conformity to the criteria of integrity and professional ethics and evaluation of candidates for the position of judges for conformity to the criterion of integrity by the High Qualification Commission of Judges has been prepared and made public. |
The measure was not implemented on time and in full
|
||
| 2 | 2.1.2.1.2 Conducting (and publishing the findings of) an analytical study of the practices of evaluation of judges for conformity to the criteria of integrity and professional ethics and evaluation of candidates for conformity to the criterion of integrity by the High Council of Justice | High Council of Justice | The report on the findings of the analysis of the practices of evaluation of judges for conformity to the criteria of integrity and professional ethics and evaluation of candidates for the position of judges for conformity to the criterion of integrity by the High Council of Justice has been prepared and made public. |
The measure was implemented on time and in full
|
||
| 3 | 2.1.2.1.3 Conducting and publicizing a comparative analysis of the reports issued by the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, and the Public Council of International Experts on the analysis of the practices of evaluation of judges for conformity to the criteria of integrity and professional ethics and evaluation of candidates for conformity to the criterion of integrity | High Council of Justice | The comparative analysis of the reports issued by the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, and the Public Council of International Experts on the analysis of the practices of evaluation of judges for conformity to the criteria of integrity and professional ethics and evaluation of candidates for conformity to the criterion of integrity has been made public. |
The measure was implemented on time and in full
|
||
| 4 | 2.1.2.1.4 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to grant the High Council of Justice the powers to approve the unified criteria (indicators) of evaluation of integrity and professional ethics of a judge as well as integrity of a candidate for the position of a judge during all procedures of selection and evaluation of judges | Ministry of Justice of Ukraine | The draft law has been submitted to the Parliament of Ukraine |
The measure was implemented on time and in full
|
||
| 5 | 2.1.2.1.5 Drafting the unified criteria (indicators) of evaluation of integrity and professional ethics of a judge as well as the criterion (indicator) of integrity of a candidate for the position of a judge, taking into account the professional profile of the judge as well as the best practices identified based on the findings of the analysis of the practices of evaluation by the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council of International Experts, and the Public Council on Integrity | High Council of Justice | Вища кваліфікаційна комісія суддів України, Громадська рада доброчесності | The unified criteria (indicators) of evaluation of integrity and professional ethics of a judge as well as the criterion (indicator) of integrity of a candidate for the position of a judge, taking into account the best practices identified based on the findings of the analysis of the practices of evaluation of the conformity of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) to criteria of integrity and professional ethics by the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council of International Experts, and the Public Council on Integrity have been prepared and made public |
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
|
|
| 6 | 2.1.2.1.6 Holding consultations with the participation of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, NGOs, and other stakeholders on the draft unified criteria (indicators) of evaluation of integrity and professional ethics of a judge as well as the criterion (indicator) of integrity of a candidate for the position of a judge, obtaining expert opinions, and revising the draft | High Council of Justice | Вища кваліфікаційна комісія суддів України, Громадська рада доброчесності, Рада суддів України | At least three consultations on the draft unified criteria (indicators) of evaluation of integrity and professional ethics of a judge as well as the criterion (indicator) of integrity of a candidate for the position of a judge have been held with the participation of representatives of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, the Public Council of International Experts, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and NGOs. |
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
|
|
| 7 | 2.1.2.1.7 Clearing, approving, and publicizing the revised draft unified criteria (indicators) of evaluation of integrity and professional ethics of a judge as well as the criterion (indicator) of integrity of a candidate for the position of a judge | High Council of Justice | Вища кваліфікаційна комісія суддів України, Громадська рада доброчесності | The unified criteria (indicators) of evaluation of integrity and professional ethics of a judge as well as the criterion (indicator) of integrity of a candidate for the position of a judge have been cleared with the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, and the Public Council of International Experts, approved and made public |
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
|
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 4
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 4
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
The findings of the analysis of the practice of evaluating judges (candidates for the position of a judge) for conformity to the criteria of integrity and professional ethics (in particular, taking into account the relevant judicial practice) have been prepared and published by: a) the Public Council on Integrity (2.5 percent); b) the Public Council of International Experts (2.5 percent); c) the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (2.5 percent); d) the High Council of Justice (2.5 percent). |
10% |
| 2 | набрав чинності закон, яким передбачено затвердження Єдиних показників для оцінки доброчесності та професійної етики судді (кандидата на посаду судді) під час усіх процедур добору та оцінювання суддів. Проведення процедур кваліфікаційного оцінювання не повинно призвести до повторного оцінювання тих суддів, що пройшли таке кваліфікаційне оцінювання під час процедур первинного кваліфікаційного оцінювання, конкурсних процедур чи процедур добору | 30% |
| 3 |
Єдині показники для оцінки доброчесності та професійної етики судді (кандидата на посаду судді): а) розроблені Вищою радою правосуддя, Вищою кваліфікаційною комісією суддів України, Громадською радою доброчесності з урахуванням найкращих практик, визначених за результатами аналізу практики проведення оцінки відповідності суддів критеріям доброчесності та професійної етики, а кандидатів на посаду судді — критерію доброчесності (9 відсотків); б) розроблені у консультаціях Вищої ради правосуддя, Вищої кваліфікаційної комісії суддів України, Громадської ради доброчесності, Ради суддів України, неурядових організацій (9 відсотків); в) затверджені (9 відсотків); г) оприлюднені (9 відсотків); д) застосовуються Вищою радою правосуддя, Вищою кваліфікаційною комісією суддів України, Громадською радою доброчесності (9 відсотків) |
45% |
| 4 |
щонайменше 80 відсотків фахівців у сфері правосуддя оцінюють, що: а) Єдині показники для оцінки доброчесності та професійної етики судді (кандидата на посаду судді), які застосовуються на практиці, повністю або здебільшого враховують професіограму судді, а також усі найкращі практики попереднього проведення оцінки відповідності суддів критеріям доброчесності та професійної етики, а кандидатів на посаду судді — критерію доброчесності Вищої ради правосуддя, Вищої кваліфікаційної комісії суддів України, Громадської ради доброчесності (5 відсотків); б) Єдині показники для оцінки доброчесності та професійної етики судді (кандидата на посаду судді), які застосовуються на практиці, є всеохоплюючими і стосуються усіх необхідних аспектів (5 відсотків); в) Єдині показники для оцінки доброчесності та професійної етики судді (кандидата на посаду судді) систематично застосовуються у діяльності Вищої ради правосуддя, Вищої кваліфікаційної комісії суддів України, Громадської ради доброчесності (5 відсотків) |
15% |