Problem
1.2.2. The lack of objective coverage of the situation with preventing and combating corruption in Ukraine leads to a distorted public perception of the causes of corruption, its level, and the effectiveness of anticorruption institutions.
General information about the problem
One of the main reasons for biased coverage of the situation with the prevention and combating of corruption in Ukraine is the lack of a coordinated unified information policy of the state in matters of anticorruption efforts. Since 2020, Ukraine effectively has no anticorruption communications strategy. Meanwhile, given that the 2017-2020 Anticorruption Communications Strategy was developed in the last year of the 2014-2017 Anticorruption Strategy, it actually existed without the foundation that was supposed to be provided by the Anticorruption Strategy for the relevant period, and therefore it was impossible to effectively address the issue of biased coverage of the situation by implementing this strategic document.
The results of the analysis of media coverage of corruption show that there is little information about public policy on preventing and combating corruption, as well as its implementation.
At the same time, the distorted perception of the situation with preventing and combating corruption in Ukraine is also caused by disinformation narratives promoted by the Russian Federation in Ukraine and abroad to discredit the country. There is no proper response to such disinformation in Ukraine and abroad.
The lack of a proper information landscape in Ukraine for covering the implementation of the state’s anticorruption policy, which is a consequence of improper coordination of state communications in the field of anticorruption efforts, in practice causes a distorted perception of the level of corruption by citizens.
The results of the analysis of media coverage of corruption show that there is little information about public policy on preventing and combating corruption, as well as its implementation.
At the same time, the distorted perception of the situation with preventing and combating corruption in Ukraine is also caused by disinformation narratives promoted by the Russian Federation in Ukraine and abroad to discredit the country. There is no proper response to such disinformation in Ukraine and abroad.
The lack of a proper information landscape in Ukraine for covering the implementation of the state’s anticorruption policy, which is a consequence of improper coordination of state communications in the field of anticorruption efforts, in practice causes a distorted perception of the level of corruption by citizens.
Expand...
Implementation of SACP measures within the limits of the problem
The total number of OSR –
2
All measures of the SACP
measures, the implementation of which as of
30.09.2024
is about to begin
to be completed
3
3
1
7
Implemented
In progress
Not implemented
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 3 (42.9%)
Deadlines for all measures
01.03.2023 -
31.12.2025
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
7
Achievement of ESR within the limits of the Problem
The total number of OSR – 2
SUMMARIZED GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM MEASURES IN TERMS OF DIRECTIONS, PROBLEMS AND EXPECTED STRATEGIC RESULTS
№ | Name of the ESR | Name of the measure | The main implementer | Monitoring results (latest) | Performance note | % виконаних заходів (fully and partially) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.1. | ESR 1.2.2.1 The Anticorruption Communications Strategy has been updated; its content is being regularly updated taking into account the analysis of the effectiveness of previous communications campaigns; a proper organizational and financial foundation has been provided for coordinated efforts towards its implementation | 1.2.2.1.1. Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine the draft act approving the Anticorruption Communications Strategy up to 2025 | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | The measure was not implemented on time and in full |
200%
4/
2
|
|
1.2. | 1.2.2.1.2. Establishing a media center at the National Agency | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | The measure was not implemented on time and in full | |||
2.1. | ESR 1.2.2.2 Citizens have full and objective information about corruption in Ukraine, its causes, status and dynamics, the system of anticorruption institutions, division of powers among them, as well as the effectiveness of various state bodies in preventing and combating corruption, the possibility and ways of interaction between citizens and anticorruption institutions in terms of reporting corruption and exercising public control | 1.2.2.2.1. Analysis by the National Agency and the Ministry of Culture and Information Policy of the most common disinformation narratives relating to anticorruption efforts in Ukraine, publication of the analysis findings on the official websites of the National Agency, the Ministry of Culture and Information Policy, and the Center for Countering Disinformation, and making this analysis a common practice | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | The measure was implemented on time and in full |
100%
5/
5
|
|
2.2. | 1.2.2.2.2. Creation and dissemination by the National Agency and the Ministry of Culture and Information Policy of narratives relating to anticorruption efforts in Ukraine among organizational units of the central executive authorities in charge of communication | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | There is progress in the implementation of the measure | |||
2.3. | 1.2.2.2.3. Tracking narratives relating to anticorruption efforts in the media space and appropriately responding to disinformation | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | There is progress in the implementation of the measure | |||
2.4. | 1.2.2.2.4. Ensuring the development of a communications campaign focusing on the role of the central executive authorities and local self-government bodies in anticorruption efforts: 1) analyzing sources of information to gage the public opinion on the anticorruption authorities; 2) developing a general plan of the communications campaign based on the information gathered. | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | The measure has not been implemented | |||
2.5. | 1.2.2.2.5. Launching the communications campaign focusing on the role of the central executive authorities and local self-government bodies in anticorruption efforts | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | Implementation of the measure has started on time |