Expected strategic result 2.1.3.2. The list and grounds for bringing a judge to disciplinary liability and the kinds of liability have been clarified in a way that allows judges to predict their behavior, in particular, the signs of disciplinary offenses that tarnish the title of judge or undermine the authority of justice have been more clearly defined, and the mechanisms for disciplinary investigation and consideration of disciplinary cases have been improved and simplified

Information about ESR Feedback from the public
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 21.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
1 1 1
3
In progress Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 0 ( 0%)
Display in tabular form

Measures — 3

2.1.3.2.1. Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to update the list of grounds for bringing a judge to disciplinary liability in keeping with the principle of legal certainty and in accordance with GRECO recommendations

The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention

2.1.3.2.2. Preparing and publicizing an analytical report on the expediency of continued improvement and simplification of procedures of disciplinary proceedings against judges

The main implementer: Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

2.1.3.2.3. Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report indicated in subclause 2.1.3.2.2 with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community

The main implementer: Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

Indicators — 3

Evaluation of achievement of ESR — indicator weight —
1
0 / 55%

a law has taken effect, which has updated the list of grounds for bringing a judge to disciplinary liability in keeping with the principle of legal certainty and in accordance with GRECO recommendations.

2
0 / 15%

an analytical report on the expediency of continued improvement and simplification of procedures of disciplinary proceedings against judges has been made public.

3
0 / 30%

at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that:
a) the grounds for disciplinary liability of judges are defined sufficiently clearly and understandably in order to enable judges to predict the consequences of their conduct and actions (10 percent);
b) the updated grounds for disciplinary liability of judges ensure full alignment with GRECO recommendations (5 percent);
c) the mechanism of disciplinary proceedings is generally or for the most part efficient and effective (15 percent).

* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)