SUMMARIZED GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM MEASURES IN TERMS OF DIRECTIONS, PROBLEMS AND EXPECTED STRATEGIC RESULTS
ESR: 2.1.3.2. The list and grounds for bringing a judge to disciplinary liability and the kinds of liability have been clarified in a way that allows judges to predict their behavior, in particular, the signs of disciplinary offenses that tarnish the title of judge or undermine the authority of justice have been more clearly defined, and the mechanisms for disciplinary investigation and consideration of disciplinary cases have been improved and simplified
Progress in the implementation of measures as of
03.07.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of
31.03.2024
3
3
Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) -
0 (
0%)
| № | Name of the ESR | Name of the measure | The main implementer | Monitoring results (latest) | Status | % of measures implemented (fully and partially) | Evaluation of achievement of ESR | Середній рівень ОСР |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direction 2.1. Fair courts, prosecutorial and law enforcement authorities |
0%
0 /
3
|
0.0% | ||||||
| Problem 2.1.3. Lack of effective mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and responding to established facts of influence, pressure on judges and interference in their activities |
0%
0 /
3
|
0.0% | ||||||
| 2.1 | ОСР 2.1.3.2. The list and grounds for bringing a judge to disciplinary liability and the kinds of liability have been clarified in a way that allows judges to predict their behavior, in particular, the signs of disciplinary offenses that tarnish the title of judge or undermine the authority of justice have been more clearly defined, and the mechanisms for disciplinary investigation and consideration of disciplinary cases have been improved and simplified | 2.1.3.2.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to update the list of grounds for bringing a judge to disciplinary liability in keeping with the principle of legal certainty and in accordance with GRECO recommendations | National Agency on Corruption Prevention |
0%
0 /
3
|
0.0%
|
|
||
| 2.2 | 2.1.3.2.2 Preparing and publicizing an analytical report on the expediency of continued improvement and simplification of procedures of disciplinary proceedings against judges | Ministry of Justice of Ukraine | Implementation of the measure has not started | |||||
| 2.3 | 2.1.3.2.3 Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report indicated in subclause 2.1.3.2.2 with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community | Ministry of Justice of Ukraine | Implementation of the measure has not started | |||||