SUMMARIZED GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM MEASURES IN TERMS OF DIRECTIONS, PROBLEMS AND EXPECTED STRATEGIC RESULTS

ESR: 2.1.3.3. The disciplinary practice with respect to judges is consistent, predictable, stable, and open; all decisions of the disciplinary authority are made public on time; disciplinary proceedings against judges are generally open and broadcast in real time

Progress in the implementation of measures as of 05.03.2026
4
4
Implemented
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 4 (100%)
Selected filters:
Measures to be enforceable
Clean the filter
Download the table
№ Name of the ESR Name of the measure The main implementer Monitoring results (latest) Status % of measures implemented (fully and partially)
Direction 2.1. Fair courts, prosecutorial and law enforcement authorities
100% 4 / 4
Problem 2.1.3. Lack of effective mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and responding to established facts of influence, pressure on judges and interference in their activities
100% 4 / 4
3.1 ОСР 2.1.3.3. The disciplinary practice with respect to judges is consistent, predictable, stable, and open; all decisions of the disciplinary authority are made public on time; disciplinary proceedings against judges are generally open and broadcast in real time 2.1.3.3.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law that: 1) stipulates that sessions of Disciplinary Chambers of the High Council of Justice shall be public with real-time video broadcasts; 2) stipulates that the sessions of the High Council of Justice convened to examine complaints against decisions of Disciplinary Chambers following the review of disciplinary proceedings against a judge shall be public with real-time video broadcasts; 3) defines the exhaustive list of grounds for an examination behind closed doors during a session of Disciplinary Chambers of the High Council of Justice without real-time video broadcasts; 4) establishes the exhaustive list of grounds for holding an examination behind closed doors during the session of the High Council of Justice convened to examine complaints against decisions of Disciplinary Chambers following the review of disciplinary proceedings against a judge without real-time video broadcasts; 5) stipulates that an examination behind closed doors during a session of Disciplinary Chambers of the High Council of Justice without real-time video broadcasts is possible only based on a well-reasoned decision of the Disciplinary Chambers of the High Council of Justice with the substantiation of the existence of the relevant grounds prescribed by law; 6) stipulates that an examination behind closed doors during a session of the High Council of Justice convened to examine complaints against decisions of Disciplinary Chambers of the High Council of Justice without real-time video broadcasts is possible only based on a well-reasoned decision of the High Council of Justice with the substantiation of the existence of the relevant grounds prescribed by law; 7) defines a clear time frame for each stage of the disciplinary proceeding, which would rule out the possibility of unreasonable delays in the review of disciplinary complaints; 8) provides for open and roll-call voting by members of the Disciplinary Chambers of the High Council of Justice and by the High Council of Justice on decisions in disciplinary cases. Ministry of Justice of Ukraine The measure was implemented on time and in full Implemented
100% 4 / 4
3.2 2.1.3.3.2 Preparing and annually publishing summaries of the disciplinary practice of Disciplinary Chambers of the High Council of Justice for the previous calendar year High Council of Justice The measure was implemented on time and in full Implemented
3.3 2.1.3.3.3 Preparing and annually publishing summaries of the disciplinary practice of the High Council of Justice in revising the decisions of Disciplinary Chambers of the High Council of Justice for the previous calendar year High Council of Justice The measure was implemented on time and in full Implemented
3.4 2.1.3.3.4 Holding annual discussions of the summaries of disciplinary practice prepared by Disciplinary Chambers of the High Council of Justice and by the High Council of Justice, with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community High Council of Justice The measure was implemented on time and in full Implemented