SUMMARIZED GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM MEASURES IN TERMS OF DIRECTIONS, PROBLEMS AND EXPECTED STRATEGIC RESULTS
ESR: 2.1.3.5. An effective mechanism has been introduced for verifying the legality of the origin of a judge’s property; judges who have violated the obligation to prove the legality of the source of their property have been dismissed pursuant to Article 126 of the Constitution of Ukraine
Progress in the implementation of measures as of
03.07.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of
31.03.2024
1
1
In progress
Measures implemented (fully and partially) -
0 (
0%)
| № | Name of the ESR | Name of the measure | The main implementer | Monitoring results (latest) | Status | % of measures implemented (fully and partially) | Evaluation of achievement of ESR | Середній рівень ОСР |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direction 2.1. Fair courts, prosecutorial and law enforcement authorities |
0%
0 /
1
|
0.0% | ||||||
| Problem 2.1.3. Lack of effective mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and responding to established facts of influence, pressure on judges and interference in their activities |
0%
0 /
1
|
0.0% | ||||||
| 5.1 | ОСР 2.1.3.5. An effective mechanism has been introduced for verifying the legality of the origin of a judge’s property; judges who have violated the obligation to prove the legality of the source of their property have been dismissed pursuant to Article 126 of the Constitution of Ukraine | 2.1.3.5.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law that: 1) institutes a separate procedure for checking the legitimacy of the sources of origin of the judge’s assets (outside the scope of the disciplinary proceedings), which will be carried out by the National Agency; 2) institutes a separate procedure by which the High Council of Justice would review petitions for the dismissal of the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets; 3) institutes a separate procedure by which the judge or plaintiff (complainant) can appeal decisions, actions, or omissions to act as part of the process of verifying the legitimacy of the origin of the judge’s assets, and dismiss the judge on account of the violation of the obligation to prove the legitimacy of the origin of assets. | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | Implementation of the measure has started on time |
0%
0 /
1
|
0.0%
|
|
|