Progress in the implementation of measures as of 22.12.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
2 1 4
7
Implemented Partially implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 3 ( 42.9%)
Display in tabular form

Measures — 7

2.1.6.3.1. Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law stipulating that:
1) the procedure of certification of police officers must include the mandatory evaluation of the effectiveness of police officers, and the existing criteria must be supplemented with such evaluation criteria as integrity (using the reasonable doubt approach), managerial competencies (for managers), and job performance;
2) the evaluation of a police officer’s effectiveness as part of certification shall be carried out in the electronic human resources management system (e-HR);
3) the consolidated results of evaluation of the effectiveness of police officers as part of certification shall be published on the official website of the National Police;
4) an interview as a method of evaluation of managerial competencies shall be conducted only for police officers in managerial positions by a committee at least 25 percent of whose members are representatives of the public;
5) the evaluation rating of police officers and the recommendations of the electronic evaluation system must be considered when approving managerial and staffing decisions at the National Police, including with respect to awarding additional kinds of monthly allowances, bonuses.

The main implementer: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine

2.1.6.3.2. Drafting normative legal acts of the Ministry of Internal Affairs needed for the implementation of the law indicated in subclause 2.1.6.3.1, stipulating that:
1) the methods of evaluation include: computer testing; evaluation using the “360 degrees method” (i.e., anonymous gathering of information about a police officer from other fellow police officers, civil servants, and employees of the police with whom this police officer interacts while performing official duties); an interview with the evaluation committee (only for managers);
2) evaluation against the criteria of integrity (using the reasonable doubt approach), professional, functional, and managerial (for managers) competencies of police officers shall be carried out as part of each evaluation method, and the criterion of a police officer’s job performance shall be evaluated using computer analysis of statistical data on each police officer;
3) during the interview (for managers), every committee member shall give a score for each criterion against which a police officer is evaluated; the interview shall be recorded on video and audio tape;
4) each evaluation committee shall have at least 25 percent of its seats filled by representatives of the public, while the other members shall be appointed from among police officers selected randomly by the electronic evaluation system among police officers with the highest rating based on the outcome of previous evaluations;
5) based on the outcome of the evaluation, each police officer shall be assigned an evaluation rating in the electronic evaluation system, which consists of: a) the overall score reflecting the degree to which the police officer fits the position held; b) the overall potential of the police officer’s professional development;
6) the evaluation rating of police officers is assigned in points using a unified software algorithm and exclusively by the electronic evaluation system based on the input of scores received by the police officer for each criterion after testing, evaluation using the “360 degrees method”, the interview (for managers only), as well as job performance data;
7) in calculating the rating, the unit weight of scores received by the police officer for each of the evaluation criteria is the same; consolidated and depersonalized rating data shall be published on the official website of the National Police;
8) based on the data gathered, the electronic evaluation system will general recommendations for each police officer regarding a specific training program to be completed at educational institutions that train police officers or at the unit where the police officer is working.

The main implementer: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine

2.1.6.3.3. Holding a public discussion of the draft normative legal acts of the Ministry of Internal Affairs indicated in subclause 2.1.6.3.2, and ensuring their revision (if needed)

The main implementer: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine

2.1.6.3.4. Approving the draft normative legal acts of the Ministry of Internal Affairs indicated in subclause 2.1.6.3.2 and submitting them for state registration

The main implementer: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine

2.1.6.3.5. Supporting the state registration of draft normative legal acts of the Ministry of Internal Affairs indicated in subclause 2.1.6.3.2 and their official publication

The main implementer: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine

2.1.6.3.6. Arranging an analytical study focused on the prospects of improvement of the staffing policy and changes in the conditions of remuneration of police officers with a view to enhancing the competitive ability of police service in the labor market, including proposals regarding the sources of funding to cover additional expenses for remuneration of police officers

The main implementer: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine

2.1.6.3.7. Presenting a report on the findings of the analytical study indicated in subclause 2.1.6.3.6, conducing an expert discussion of the report, reviewing suggestions and critical comments

The main implementer: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine

Indicators — 3

Evaluation of achievement of ESR — indicator weight —
1
0 / 35%

A law has taken effect, which:
a) stipulates that the procedure of certification of police officers must include the mandatory evaluation of the effectiveness of police officers, and the existing criteria must be supplemented with such evaluation criteria as integrity (using the reasonable doubt approach), managerial competencies (for managers), and job performance (10 percent);
b) stipulates that the evaluation of a police officer’s effectiveness as part of certification shall be carried out in the electronic human resources management system (e-HR) (10 percent);
c) stipulates that the consolidated results of evaluation of the effectiveness of police officers as part of certification shall be published on the official website of the National Police (5 percent);
d) stipulates that an interview as a method of evaluation of managerial competencies shall be conducted only for police officers in managerial positions by a committee at least 25 percent of whose members are representatives of the public (5 percent);
e) stipulates that the evaluation rating of police officers and the recommendations of the electronic evaluation system must be considered when approving managerial and staffing decisions at the National Police, including with respect to awarding additional kinds of monthly allowances, bonuses (5 percent).

2
0 / 35%

Normative legal acts of the Ministry of Internal Affairs needed for the implementation of the law indicated in subclause 1 of clause 2.1.6.3 have taken effect, stipulating that:
a) the methods of evaluation include: computer testing; evaluation using the “360 degrees method” (i.e., anonymous gathering of information about a police officer from other fellow police officers, civil servants, and employees of the police with whom this police officer interacts while performing official duties); an interview with the evaluation committee (only for managers) (6 percent);
b) evaluation against the criteria of integrity (using the reasonable doubt approach), professional, functional, and managerial (for managers) competencies of police officers shall be carried out as part of each evaluation method, and the criterion of a police officer’s job performance shall be evaluated using computer analysis of statistical data on each police officer (4 percent);
c) during the interview (for managers), every committee member shall give a score for each criterion against which a police officer is evaluated (4 percent);
d) each evaluation committee shall have at least 25 percent of its seats filled by representatives of the public, while the other members shall be appointed from among police officers selected randomly by the electronic evaluation system among police officers with the highest rating based on the outcome of previous evaluations (5 percent);
e) based on the outcome of the evaluation, each police officer shall be assigned an evaluation rating in the electronic evaluation system, which consists of: the overall score reflecting the degree to which the police officer fits the position held; the overall potential of the police officer’s professional development (4 percent);
f) the evaluation rating of police officers is assigned in points using a unified software algorithm and exclusively by the electronic evaluation system based on the input of scores received by the police officer for each criterion after testing, evaluation using the “360 degrees method”, the interview (for managers only), as well as job performance data (4 percent);
g) in calculating the rating, the unit weight of scores received by the police officer for each of the evaluation criteria is the same; consolidated and depersonalized rating data shall be published on the official website of the National Police (4 percent);
h) based on the data gathered, the electronic evaluation system will general recommendations for each police officer regarding a specific training program to be completed at educational institutions that train police officers or at the unit where the police officer is working (4 percent).

3
0 / 30%

оприлюднено аналітичний звіт МВС за результатами дослідження перспектив удосконалення кадрової політики та зміни умов оплати праці поліцейських з метою підвищення конкурентоспроможності служби в поліції на ринку праці, який, зокрема, містить пропозиції щодо вирішення проблеми низької оплати праці поліцейських

* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)