Progress in the implementation of measures as of
18.11.2024
Measures implemented (fully and partially) -
3 (
50%)
Measures —
6
2.3.2.2.1.
Conducting ongoing monitoring of the effectiveness of post-customs control measures, including with the involvement of business associations, and annual public reporting on the results of application of post-audit control
The main implementer:
State Customs Service of Ukraine
2.3.2.2.2.
Gathering and publishing annual statistical data on the forms of control carried out by customs officials, making it possible to determine the share of post-customs control measures among other forms of control
The main implementer:
State Customs Service of Ukraine
2.3.2.2.3.
Ensuring an increase in the share of post-customs control measures among other customs control forms, taking into account the statistical data published as part of the assignment indicated in subclause 2.3.2.2.2
The main implementer:
State Customs Service of Ukraine
2.3.2.2.4.
Drafting an order on amendments to the Procedure for Risk Analysis and Assessment, Development and Implementation of Risk Management Measures for Purposes of Determining the Forms and Scope of Customs Control, approved by the order of the Ministry of Finance dated July 31, 2015, No. 684, according to which the risk management system is used to determine whether or not post-customs control should be carried out.
The main implementer:
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine
2.3.2.2.5.
Holding a public discussion of the draft order indicated in subclause 2.3.2.2.4, and ensuring its revision (if needed), issuance, and submission for state registration
The main implementer:
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine
2.3.2.2.6.
Supporting the state registration of the order indicated in subclause 2.3.2.2.4 and its official publication
The main implementer:
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine
Indicators —
3
Evaluation of achievement of ESR —
indicator weight —
1
A report is published annually on the application of post-clearance control based on the results of monitoring of the effectiveness of post-clearance control measures, including with the involvement of business associations.
2
Amendments to the Procedure for Risk Analysis and Assessment,
Development and Implementation of Risk Management Measures for Purposes of Determining the Forms and Scope of Customs Control, approved by the order of the Ministry of Finance dated July 31, 2015, No. 684, have taken effect, according to which the risk management system is used to determine whether or not post-customs control should be carried out.
3
the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that:
a) more than 75 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of implementation of the customs post-audit as a factor of mitigation of manifestations of corruption at customs offices as high or very high (10 percent);
b) more than 50 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of implementation of the customs post-audit as a factor of mitigation of manifestations of corruption at customs offices as high or very high (7 percent);
c) more than 25 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of implementation of the customs post-audit as a factor of mitigation of manifestations of corruption at customs offices as high or very high (4 percent).
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)