Expected strategic result 2.4.2.1. Instruments have been put in place to prevent the negative impact of privatization authorities and organizers of privatization auctions on the number of bidders and competition.
Measures — 2
2.4.2.1.1. Supporting the consideration in the Parliament of Ukraine (particularly if the President of Ukraine vetoes the draft law) of the draft law on the list of facilities under state ownership that are ineligible for privatization (registration number 4020 dated September 2, 2020), which defines the list of facilities under state ownership that are ineligible for privatization
The main implementer: Ministry of Economy of Ukraine
2.4.2.1.2. Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine the draft resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on approval of the Procedure for Holding Electronic Auctions to Sell Assets of Major Privatization and Choosing the Winning Bidder Based on the Outcome of the Electronic Auction
The main implementer: State Property Fund of Ukraine
Indicators — 4
The law that updates the list of state-owned facilities that are not subject to privatization has taken effect.
The Procedure for Holding Electronic Auctions to Sell Assets of Major Privatization and Choosing the Winning Bidder Based on the Outcome of the Electronic Auction has been approved.
The average number of bidders in privatization auctions (per privatization lot) is:
a) no less than six (30 percent);
b) no less than five (25 percent);
c) no less than four (20 percent);
d) no less than three (15 percent);
e) no less than two (10 percent).
at least 80 percent of experts on the regulation of the economy and businesses estimate that:
a) the procedures for transferring assets to the State Property Fund and other privatization authorities are fully or mostly optimal and efficient (4 percent);
b) in practice, the transfer of assets to the State Property Fund and other privatization authorities always or mostly takes place without unreasonable delays (3 percent);
c) the legislation has been completely or mostly rid of provisions that caused a negative impact of privatization authorities and organizers of privatization auctions on the number of bidders and competition (3 percent);
d) in practice, the negative impact of privatization authorities and organizers of privatization auctions on the number of bidders and competition is always or mostly absent (4 percent);
e) the powers of the State Property Fund are fully or mostly sufficient for effective and efficient preparation of assets for privatization (3 percent);
f) privatization procedures always or mostly make it possible to attract a sufficient number of bidders and ensure an appropriate level of fair competition among them (3 percent).