Expected strategic result 1.3.3.1. Owing to regulatory and legal regulation, the activities of agents influence (lobbying) are carried out within the legal framework and have become understandable and transparent for the whole society
Measures — 2
1.3.3.1.1. Conducting an analytical study of the legal mechanisms of lobbying employed in other countries in order to determine the model that could be applied in the legal system of Ukraine and would ensure a procedure of transparent influence on the process of administrative decision making exerted by the concerned commercial entities, NGOs, public associations, or separate individuals
The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention
1.3.3.1.2.
Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to define:
1) the rules to be followed by officials of government agencies and local self-government bodies in interacting with stakeholders and agents of influence (lobbyists);
2) transparent mechanisms for influencing officials of government agencies and local self-government bodies;
3) mechanisms used to control lobbying activities and the agency authorized to exercise such control;
4) liability of the parties to lobbyist relationships for violation of rules governing their interaction and transparency of the lobbying process
The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention
Indicators — 2
the law has taken effect, which defines:
a) effective rules to be followed by officials of government agencies and local self-government bodies in interacting with stakeholders and agents of influence (lobbyists) (20 percent);
b) transparent mechanisms to be used by agents of influence (lobbyists) to influence officials of government agencies and local self-government bodies (20 percent);
c) mechanisms used to control lobbying activities and the agency authorized to exercise such control (30 percent);
d) liability for violations of the requirements of the relevant law (20 percent).
the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that:
a) more than 75 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of legal regulation implemented by the law indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.3.1 as high or very high (10 percent);
b) more than 50 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of legal regulation implemented by the law indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.3.1 as high or very high (7 percent);
c) more than 25 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of legal regulation implemented by the law indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.3.1 as high or very high (3 percent).