Expected strategic result 1.3.4.3. The monitoring of the effectiveness of measures towards holding members of the Parliament of Ukraine, members of local councils, and elected local self-government officials liable for violations of the ethical code of conduct has been ensured
Measures — 2
1.3.4.3.1. Preparing and publicizing a report on the findings of the monitoring of the effectiveness of efforts to hold accountable the Parliament Members of Ukraine, members of local councils, and elected officials of local self-government bodies for violations of rules of ethical conduct (with recommendations on ways to improve the legislation and practices of its enforcement)
The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention
1.3.4.3.2. Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law based on the recommendations indicated in subclause 1.3.4.3.1, which proposes to improve the grounds and mechanisms for holding accountable the Parliament Members of Ukraine, members of local councils, and elected officials of local self-government bodies for violations of rules of ethical conduct (if necessary)
The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention
Indicators — 3
The annual report on the findings of the monitoring by the National Agency of the effectiveness of efforts to hold accountable the Parliament Members of Ukraine, members of local councils, and elected officials of local self-government bodies for violations of rules of ethical conduct has been made public (with recommendations on ways to improve the legislation and/or practices of its enforcement).
The law developed according to the recommendations provided in the annual report indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.4.3 has taken effect, which provides for improvements to the grounds and mechanisms for holding accountable the Parliament Members of Ukraine, members of local councils, and elected officials of local self-government bodies for violations of rules of ethical conduct (if necessary).
the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that:
a) more than 75 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of implementation of measures involving the prosecution of the liable entities as high or very high (10 percent);
b) more than 50 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of implementation of measures involving the prosecution of the liable entities as high or very high (6 percent);
c) more than 25 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of implementation of measures involving the prosecution of the liable entities as high or very high (3 percent).