Expected strategic result 1.4.1.2. The list of declarants has been revised and updated taking into account the results of corruption risk assessment conducted by the National Agency

Information about ESR Feedback from the public
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 21.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
1 3
4
Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 0 ( 0%)
Display in tabular form

Measures — 4

1.4.1.2.1. Developing the draft Corruption Risk Assessment Methodology

The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention

1.4.1.2.2. Holding a public discussion of the draft Corruption Risk Assessment Methodology

The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention

1.4.1.2.3. Final revision (if needed) and approval of the Corruption Risk Assessment Methodology

The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention

1.4.1.2.4. Conducting an assessment of corruption risks and using its findings to revise the list of individuals obligated to submit a declaration of a person authorized to carry out the functions of state or local self-government

The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention

Indicators — 3

Evaluation of achievement of ESR — indicator weight —
1
0 / 60%

A corruption risk assessment methodology has been developed with the objective of compiling the list of individuals obligated to submit a declaration of a person authorized to carry out the functions of state or local self-government.

i
2
0 / 20%

The findings of corruption risk assessment have been used to compile the list of individuals obligated to submit a declaration of a person authorized to carry out the functions of state or local self-government.

i
3
0 / 20%

The results of a survey of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy have demonstrated that:
a) more than 75 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of corruption risk assessment conducted per subclause 2 of clause 1.4.1.2 as high or very high (20 percent);
b) more than 50 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of corruption risk assessment conducted per subclause 2 of clause 1.4.1.2 as high or very high (15 percent);
c) more than 25 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of corruption risk assessment conducted per subclause 2 of clause 1.4.1.2 as high or very high (10 percent).

i
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)