Expected strategic result 2.1.1.3. A member of the High Council of Justice or the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine is unable to pass decisions when faced with a conflict of interest

Information about ESR Feedback from the public
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 23.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
1 1
2
Implemented Not implemented
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 1 ( 50%)
Display in tabular form

Measures — 2

2.1.1.3.1. Arranging an analytical study of the mechanism of prevention and resolution of conflicts of interest in the proceedings of the High Council of Justice and the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the problems inherent in this mechanism and proposals on how to address them, and the presentation of the analytical study (particularly regarding the possibility of reporting a potential conflict of interest or submitting a voluntary declaration of private interest)

The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention

2.1.1.3.2. Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to eliminate the existing problems inherent in the mechanism of prevention and regulation of the conflict of interest in the proceedings of the High Council of Justice and the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, taking into account the findings of the analytical study indicated in subclause 2.1.1.3.1

The main implementer: National Agency on Corruption Prevention

Indicators — 3

Evaluation of achievement of ESR — indicator weight —
1
0 / 30%

A report on the findings of the analytical study of the mechanisms of prevention and resolution of conflicts of interest in the proceedings of the High Council of Justice and the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine has been published.

2
0 / 60%

A law has taken effect, which has resolved the problems inherent in the mechanisms of prevention and resolution of conflicts of interest in the proceedings of the High Council of Justice and the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

3
0 / 10%

at least 80 percent of justice experts evaluate:
a) the implemented procedure for reporting conflicts of interest in the work of a member of the High Council of Justice and the procedure for resolving conflicts of interest as being completely or generally effective in ensuring the impartiality and unbiased nature of decisions of the High Council of Justice (5 percent);
b) the implemented procedure for reporting conflicts of interest in the work of a member of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine and the procedure for resolving conflicts of interest as being completely or generally effective in ensuring the impartiality and unbiased nature of decisions of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (5 percent).

* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)