SUMMARIZED GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM MEASURES IN TERMS OF DIRECTIONS, PROBLEMS AND EXPECTED STRATEGIC RESULTS

Problem: 2.1.5. Internal administrative processes in prosecutorial authorities are not always transparent and effective

Progress in the implementation of measures as of 02.06.2025
measures, the implementation of which as of 31.03.2025
1 1 2
4
Implemented Partially implemented In progress
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 2 (50%)
Якісний рівень досягнення ОСР
1 33.3%
High
0.0%
Middle
2 66.7%
Low
 
Середня оцінка досягнення ОСР, %
23.3
%
Download the table
№ Name of the ESR Name of the measure The main implementer Monitoring results (latest) Status % of measures implemented (fully and partially) Evaluation of achievement of ESR Середній рівень ОСР
Direction 2.1. Fair courts, prosecutorial and law enforcement authorities
50% 2 / 4
24.4%
Problem 2.1.5. Internal administrative processes in prosecutorial authorities are not always transparent and effective
50% 2 / 4
23.3%
1.1 ОСР 2.1.5.1. An electronic human resources management system, a transparent and effective system for evaluating the quality of the work of prosecutors, based on the results of which personnel and management decisions are made, as well as decisions on bonuses, have been introduced 2.1.5.1.1 Developing and launching an electronic human resources management system (e-HR) of prosecutorial authorities, with an integrated system for evaluating the performance of prosecutors Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine There is no progress in the implementation of the measure In progress
0% 0 / 2
0.0%
низький рівень
1.2 2.1.5.1.2 Launching a system for evaluating the performance of prosecutors based on the e-HR system Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine There is progress in the implementation of the measure In progress
2.1 ОСР 2.1.5.2. Amendments have been made to the Law of Ukraine On the Prosecutor’s Office; they define an exhaustive list of grounds for dismissal and termination of powers of prosecutors, including the Prosecutor General, which makes it impossible to apply them without justification 2.1.5.2.1 Analyzing the activities of the relevant authority tasked with conducting disciplinary proceedings against prosecutors Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine The measure was implemented on time and in full Implemented
100% 2 / 2
0.0%
низький рівень
2.2 2.1.5.2.2 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to amend the Law of Ukraine On Prosecutorial Authorities to improve the disciplinary procedure through: 1) optimizing the grounds for disciplinary liability of prosecutors; 2) providing clear definitions of disciplinary misconduct by prosecutors and observance of the prosecutorial code of ethics by prosecutors; 3) compiling the list of specific details that must be included in a disciplinary complaint about disciplinary misconduct by a prosecutor, and implementing a mechanism for rejecting a disciplinary complaint; 4) expanding the list of disciplinary sanctions in order to make them more proportional and effective, as well as stipulating the general conditions for imposing the sanctions, and the circumstances mitigating or aggravating the liability of a prosecutor; 5) revising the exhaustive list of grounds on which prosecutors can be dismissed, the kinds of disciplinary penalties, and the term within which prosecutors can face disciplinary liability. Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine The measure was implemented late and partially Partially implemented