SUMMARIZED GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM MEASURES IN TERMS OF DIRECTIONS, PROBLEMS AND EXPECTED STRATEGIC RESULTS
Problem: 2.2.5. Insufficient information about the activities of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine and the fact that it is vested with a number of discretionary powers complicate public control over its activities and cause a high level of corruption risks. There is no effective program to mitigate the liability of cartel members who have reported the cartel and provided evidence.
Progress in the implementation of measures as of
03.12.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of
30.09.2024
4 |
100%
4
Partially implemented
Measures implemented (fully and partially) -
4 (
100%)
№
Name of the ESR
Name of the measure
The main implementer
Monitoring results (latest)
Status
% of measures implemented (fully and partially)
Evaluation of achievement of ESR
Середній рівень ОСР
Direction 2.2.
State regulation of the economy
100%
4 /
4
0.0%
Problem 2.2.5.
Insufficient information about the activities of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine and the fact that it is vested with a number of discretionary powers complicate public control over its activities and cause a high level of corruption risks. There is no effective program to mitigate the liability of cartel members who have reported the cartel and provided evidence.
100%
4 /
4
0.0%
1.1
ОСР
2.2.5.1.
The Antimonopoly Committee operates according to the principles of transparency, predictability, and legal certainty; the level of corruption risks in its activities has significantly decreased owing to unimpeded but regulated public access to discussions at the stage of announcement of decisions, draft regulations, plans and results of the Antimonopoly Committee’s activities
ОСР
2.2.5.2.
The legislation obligates the Antimonopoly Committee to publish on its official website:
recommendations issued to government agencies, local self-government bodies, organizations, business entities, associations;
the complete list of cases being examined by the Antimonopoly Committee along with the regularly updated details of each case involving a violation of the requirements of legislation on the protection of economic competition, specifically the gist of the case, the general stages of examination
ОСР
2.2.5.3.
The excessive level of discretion in the exercise of powers by the Antimonopoly Committee has been eliminated, in particular when it comes to determining:
the commencement of examination of a case involving a violation of the requirements of legislation on the protection of economic competition, the estimated timeframe for consideration of such a case and, if necessary, the possibility of extending this timeframe with appropriate justification;
the timeframe for verifying information about illegally obtained government aid;
ways to improve the mechanism for appointing and replacing state commissioners responsible for examining cases involving violations of the legislation on protection of economic competition, taking into account their professional qualities, experience, impartiality, independence, legality and validity of their decisions;
ways to improve approaches to determining the amount of the fine and the procedure for calculating the fine imposed for violations of the legislation on protection of economic competition
ОСР
2.2.5.4.
To encourage disclosure of cartels, the mechanism of exemption or mitigation of liability of cartel members who report the cartel to the Antimonopoly Committee and provide relevant evidence has been improved on the basis of best practices of the European Union