3.1.1. Violations of the requirements of anticorruption legislation are not always treated as a disciplinary offense in practice; a large share of individuals subject to the Law of Ukraine On Prevention of Corruption manage to avoid disciplinary penalties

Information about the problem
expected strategic
results 4
measures 6
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 22.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
1 2 3
6
Implemented Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 1 ( 16.7%)
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
Expected strategic results
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — % evaluation of achievement of ESR —
3.1.1.1. Legislative provisions defining the grounds and procedure for bringing entities subject to the Law On Prevention of Corruption to disciplinary account for violations of anticorruption legislation have been improved by introducing basic rules to the effect that:
a gross violation of the requirements of said Law shall be grounds for brining such individuals to disciplinary account;
separate grounds for initiating a disciplinary proceeding shall be a legally binding court decision that imposed on them an administrative penalty for committing a corruption-related offense, or discontinued proceedings in a case involving such a violation due to an expired statute of limitations for imposing the administrative penalty, or relief of administrative liability granted due to the negligible nature of the offense;
a legally binding court verdict that imposed on them a criminal penalty for committing corruption or a corruption-related offense, as well as a court ruling that relieves this individual of criminal liability shall serve as unconditional grounds for dismissing this person
0%
Measure
3.1.1.1.1 Measure
3.1.1.1.2
3.1.1.2. Disciplinary and administrative liability is established for failure to comply with the requirements of the law that mandates bringing offenders to disciplinary account
0%
* Measure
3.1.1.2.1 * Measure
3.1.1.2.2
3.1.1.3. The Law provides for the following fundamental principles of bringing individuals subject to this Law to disciplinary account:
the person who has grossly violated the requirements of the Law shall face disciplinary liability irrespective of whether or not a different kind of legal liability is prescribed for this violation, and irrespective of whether or not this violation is being examined as part of judicial proceedings under criminal, administrative, or civil law, irrespective of the stage of examination, and whether or not a final decision has been made in such cases;
Statutes of limitations for imposing disciplinary penalties on different categories of officials have been unified.
0%
* Measure
3.1.1.3.1 * Measure
3.1.1.3.2
3.1.1.4. It has been legislatively mandated that courts that have examined a case involving corruption or a corruption-related offense or a case involving unjust enrichment are obligated to send a copy of the legally binding decision in the case to the government agency, local self-government body, enterprise, institution, or organization employing the person against whom this case was initiated
25%
Measure
3.1.1.4.1 Measure
3.1.1.4.2 Measure
3.1.1.4.3 Measure
3.1.1.4.4
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)