ESR
2.1.2.4. An objective and transparent methodology for scoring and determining the results by members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine and the High Council of Justice when making decisions in the selection, evaluation, and promotion of judges, as well as for publishing information on the examinations, has been introduced
Problem solving:
2.1.2. Procedures for qualification evaluation of judges and competitive selection procedures need to be improved and clear and predictable criteria (indicators) of integrity and professional ethics should be developed. Integrity and professional ethics as standard requirements for judges are not sufficiently implemented in practice, and the evaluation of conformity to these requirements is not always transparent and predictable
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
Summarized general information on Measures
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 4
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 4
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
A law has taken effect, which: a) mandates the publication by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine of the results of examinations during the assessment of qualifications of judges (while safeguarding the personal data) (15 percent); b) defines the concept and key characteristics of a professional profile of a judge (15 percent). |
30% |
| 2 |
The professional profile of a judge: a) has been developed by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (6 percent); b) has been revised following consultations with the High Council of Justice, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and NGOs (6 percent); c) has been approved by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (6 percent); d) has been made public (6 percent); e) is constantly applied in practice, in particular, when determining detailed methodologies for scoring during the selection of judges and evaluation of qualifications (6 percent). |
30% |
| 3 |
Detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures: a) have been developed taking into account the professional profile of a judge defined by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (6 percent); b) have been revised following consultations with the High Council of Justice, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and NGOs (6 percent); c) have been approved by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (6 percent); d) have been made public (6 percent); e) are being constantly used in procedures of selection of judges and evaluation of qualifications (6 percent). |
30% |
| 4 |
at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that: a) the detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures, which are used in practice, fully or for the most part ensure the appropriate balance between objective and subjective evaluation criteria (5 percent); b) the detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures are systematically used by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine in all judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures (5 percent). |
10% |