ESR
2.1.2.4. An objective and transparent methodology for scoring and determining the results by members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine and the High Council of Justice when making decisions in the selection, evaluation, and promotion of judges, as well as for publishing information on the examinations, has been introduced
Problem solving:
2.1.2. Procedures for qualification evaluation of judges and competitive selection procedures need to be improved and clear and predictable criteria (indicators) of integrity and professional ethics should be developed. Integrity and professional ethics as standard requirements for judges are not sufficiently implemented in practice, and the evaluation of conformity to these requirements is not always transparent and predictable
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.06.2023 -
28.02.2025
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
7
3
1
2
1
Implemented
Partially implemented
In progress
Not started
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
50%
6
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
100%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
| № | Name of the measure | The main implementer | Co-implementors | Performance indicator | Monitoring results (latest) | Статус |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
2.1.2.4.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law that: 1) mandates the publication by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine of the results of examinations during the assessment of qualifications of judges (while safeguarding the personal data) |
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine | The draft law has been submitted to the Parliament of Ukraine. |
The measure was implemented on time and in full
|
||
| 2 | 2.1.2.4.2 Developing the draft professional profile of a judge | Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine | The draft professional profile of a judge has been developed. |
The measure was not implemented on time and in full
|
||
| 3 | 2.1.2.4.3 Holding consultations with the participation of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, NGOs, and other stakeholders on the draft professional profile of a judge, obtaining expert opinions, and revising the draft | Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine | Вища рада правосуддя, Громадська рада доброчесності, Рада суддів України | At least one discussion of the draft professional profile of a judge has been held with the participation of representatives of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and NGOs. |
There is no progress in the implementation of the measure
|
|
| 4 | 2.1.2.4.4 Approving and publicizing the revised professional profile of a judge | Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine | The professional profile of a judge has been approved and publicized. |
Implementation of the measure has not started
|
||
| 5 | 2.1.2.4.5 Developing the draft of detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures | Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine | The draft of detailed methods has been developed. |
The measure was implemented on time, but partially
|
||
| 6 | 2.1.2.4.6 Holding consultations with the participation of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, NGOs, and other stakeholders on the draft of detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures, obtaining expert opinions, and revising the draft | Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine | Вища рада правосуддя, Громадська рада доброчесності, Рада суддів України | At least one discussion of the draft of detailed methods has been held with the participation of representatives of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and NGOs. |
The measure was implemented on time and in full
|
|
| 7 | 2.1.2.4.7 Approving the revised detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures, and publicizing them | Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine | The detailed methods have been approved and publicized. |
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
|
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 4
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 4
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
A law has taken effect, which: a) mandates the publication by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine of the results of examinations during the assessment of qualifications of judges (while safeguarding the personal data) (30 percent) |
30% |
| 2 |
The professional profile of a judge: a) has been developed by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (6 percent); b) has been revised following consultations with the High Council of Justice, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and NGOs (6 percent); c) has been approved by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (6 percent); d) has been made public (6 percent); e) is constantly applied in practice, in particular, when determining detailed methodologies for scoring during the selection of judges and evaluation of qualifications (6 percent). |
30% |
| 3 |
Detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures: a) have been developed taking into account the professional profile of a judge defined by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (6 percent); b) have been revised following consultations with the High Council of Justice, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and NGOs (6 percent); c) have been approved by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (6 percent); d) have been made public (6 percent); e) are being constantly used in procedures of selection of judges and evaluation of qualifications (6 percent). |
30% |
| 4 |
at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that: a) the detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures, which are used in practice, fully or for the most part ensure the appropriate balance between objective and subjective evaluation criteria (5 percent); b) the detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures are systematically used by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine in all judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures (5 percent). |
10% |