Feedback from the public

ESR

2.1.4.2. E-justice has been ensured, in particular by enabling the online consideration of certain categories of cases regardless of the location of the parties and the court, which, in particular, contributes to the even allocation of cases among courts and judges

Problem solving:

2.1.4. Presence of corruption risks attributable to gaps and flaws of legislation in the system of justice

Deadlines for all measures within ESR

01.05.2023 - 31.12.2025

Implementation of SACP measures within ESR

Total number of measures – 8

2 1 3 2

Implemented Partially implemented In progress Not started

Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers

State Judicial Administration of Ukraine

Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

100%

High Council of Justice

Summarized general information on Measures

№	Name of the measure	The main implementer	Co-implementors	Performance indicator	Monitoring results (latest)	Статус
1	2.1.4.2.1 Preparing and publicizing an analytical report with recommendations on determining the categories of cases that can be examined online irrespective of the location of the parties and the court	Ministry of Justice of Ukraine	Міністерство цифрової трансформації України	The analytical report has been publicized.	The measure was implemented on time and in full	Implemented
2	2.1.4.2.2 Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community	Ministry of Justice of Ukraine	Міністерство цифрової трансформації України	The conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report have been discussed with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community.	The measure was implemented on time and in full	Implemented
3	2.1.4.2.3 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to provide for online judicial examination irrespective of the location of the parties and the court for specific categories of cases, according to the recommendations outlined in the analytical report indicated in subclause 2.1.4.2.1	Ministry of Justice of Ukraine	Міністерство цифрової трансформації України	The draft law has been submitted to the Parliament of Ukraine.	The measure was implemented late and partially	Partially implemented
4	2.1.4.2.4 Conducting an audit of the current status of information technologies in courts, as well as assessing the degree to which they align with the current tasks of the justice system. The audit should produce an assessment of the current IT solutions in accordance with best international practices and bearing in mind the cost effectiveness of the existing infrastructure, as well as the recommendations regarding the continued development and transformation of the architecture of IT systems of the judiciary.	State Judicial Administration of Ukraine		The audit of the current status of information technologies in courts has been conducted.	There is no progress in the implementation of the measure	In progress
5	2.1.4.2.5 Hiring an independent expert organization to assess the result of the spending of funds on the creation and improvement of services and modules of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System	State Judicial Administration of Ukraine		The assessment has been completed.	Implementation of the measure has not started	Not started
6	2.1.4.2.6 Developing and approving the functional requirements for the implementation of the full functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System (continued improvement of services and modules)	State Judicial Administration of Ukraine	Вища рада правосуддя	The functional requirements for the implementation of the full functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System have been approved.	There is progress in the implementation of the measure	In progress
7	2.1.4.2.7 Developing software and deploying hardware required for the implementation of the full functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System with the involvement of vendors / contractors selected through competitive and transparent public procurement processes (including the expansion of the functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System as mandated by provisions of procedural legislation and to provide courts with IT equipment (server, network, and computer hardware, particularly scanners)	State Judicial Administration of Ukraine		The software has been developed, and the hardware required for the implementation of the full functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System has been deployed.	There is progress in the implementation of the measure	In progress
8	2.1.4.2.8 Developing and approving the Regulation on the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System, which would define the procedure for the operation and usage of all subsystems (modules)	High Council of Justice	Державна судова адміністрація України, Рада суддів України	The regulation governing the procedure of operation of the subsystem designed to create and maintain personal files of judges (personal files of candidates for positions of judges) in electronic form in the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System has taken effect.		Not started

Indicators of achievement of ESR

Total number of indicators – 4

Indicators fully achieved – 1

Partially achieved indicators – 0

Indicators with a score of 0% – 3

Оцінка досягнення ОСР - 10%

Рівень досягнення ОСР - низький

Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators

* - Вага - програмне значення індикатора в ОСР

№	Indicators	Weight* (%)	Assessment of achievement		Evaluation rationale	Data source/information manager
№	Indicators	Weight* (%)	for the year 2024	for the year 2025	Evaluation rationale	Data source/information manager
1	the analytical report with recommendations on determining the categories of cases that can be examined online irrespective of the location of the parties and the court has been publicized;	10%	10%		За результатами проведення І циклу поточної (щорічної) оцінки ефективності реалізації Антикорупційної стратегії на 2021-2025 роки та Державної антикорупційної програми на 2023-2025 роки встановлено, що індикатор 1 очікуваного стратегічного результату 2.1.4.2. досягнуто повністю з огляду на те, що протягом оцінюваного періоду було підготовлено аналіз стосовно визначення категорій справ, які можуть ... ->	Official website of the Ministry of Justice Official website of the Ministry of Digital Transformation
2	the law providing for online judicial examination irrespective of the location of the parties and the court for specific categories of cases, according to the recommendations outlined in the analytical report has taken effect;	35%	0%		За результатами проведення І циклу поточної (щорічної) оцінки ефективності реалізації Антикорупційної стратегії на 2021-2025 роки та Державної антикорупційної програми на 2023-2025 роки встановлено, що індикатор 2 очікуваного стратегічного результату 2.1.4.2. не досягнуто з огляду на те, що протягом оцінюваного періоду не набрав чинності закон, яким передбачено здійснення судового розгляду он-лайн... ->	Official printed publications Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine
3	all legislatively prescribed functions of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System have been implemented;	40%	0%		За результатами проведення І циклу поточної (щорічної) оцінки ефективності реалізації Антикорупційної стратегії на 2021-2025 роки та Державної антикорупційної програми на 2023-2025 роки встановлено, що індикатор 3 очікуваного стратегічного результату 2.1.4.2. не досягнуто з огляду на те, що за інформацією, наданою Державною судовою адміністрацією України, протягом оцінюваного періоду було реалізо... ->	State Judicial Administration
4	at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that: a) online examination of cases regardless of the location of the parties and the court in certain categories of cases is used in all categories of cases where it is reasonable and advisable to do so (5 percent); b) online examination of cases regardless of the location of the parties and the court in certain categories of cases is conducted without jeopardizing the rights and legitimate interest of the parties to such proceedings (5 percent); c) the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System fully performs all of its legislatively prescribed functions (5 percent).	15%	0%		У межах проведення І циклу поточної (щорічної) оцінки індикатор 4 очікуваного стратегічного результату 2.1.4.2. не підлягає оцінюванню, оскільки таке експертне опитування не проведене. ... ->	Results of the expert survey organized by the National Agency

Key sources of assessment:

1. Міністерство юстиції України : ОСР 2.1.4.2. Індикатор 1. Моніторинговий звіт за 2023 рік

ESR