ESR
2.1.4.4. The system of enforcement of court decisions has been improved
Problem solving:
2.1.4. Presence of corruption risks attributable to gaps and flaws of legislation in the system of justice
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.03.2023 -
31.10.2024
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
5
3
1
1
In progress
Not implemented
Not started
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
0%
2
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
0%
2
State Enterprise "National Information Systems"
0%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 4
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 4
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
A law has taken effect, which: a) envisages further digitalization of the enforcement processes, in particular, the mandatory connection of banks to the data exchange system through the automated system of enforcement proceedings to ensure automated seizure of debtors’ funds in their accounts (8 percent); b) improves the procedure of enforcement of decisions that obligate the debtor to act or refrain from acting in a certain way (7 percent); c) introduces efficient and effective judicial control over the enforcement of court decisions (7 percent); d) implements effective procedures for determining or changing the method or procedure of enforcement of decisions unrelated to property (7 percent); e) revises and revokes unjustified moratoriums on the enforcement of decisions in which state-owned enterprises are named as debtors (7 percent); f) expands possibilities for enforcement of decisions by private enforcement officers (7 percent); g) improves the procedure for enforcement of decisions of international arbitration courts in Ukraine (7 percent). |
50% |
| 2 | The Unified State Register of Enforcement Documents has been put into commercial operation, taking into account the architecture requirements for subsequent application of data array technologies. | 20% |
| 3 | Data exchange and interoperability between the Unified State Register of Enforcement Documents and the Automated System of Enforcement Proceedings have been introduced. | 20% |
| 4 |
at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that: a) the enforcement processes are completely or mostly efficient and effective (in particular, owing to digitalization) (3 percent); b) legislative provisions completely or mostly prevent the parties from abusing their rights during enforcement proceedings in a balanced manner and without prejudice to the legitimate interests of these parties (3 percent); c) the legislation does not impose unjustified moratoriums on the enforcement of decisions in which state-owned enterprises are named as debtors (2 percent); d) the scope of activities of private enforcement officers is defined fully or optimally for the most part (2 percent). |
10% |