Feedback from the public

ESR

2.1.7.3. An effective mechanism for conducting an independent evaluation (audit) of the performance of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office has been introduced

Problem solving:

2.1.7. The need to improve the process of independent evaluation of the performance of anticorruption agencies and develop mechanisms for holding them liable

Deadlines for all measures within ESR

01.01.2024 - 30.11.2024

Implementation of SACP measures within ESR

Total number of measures – 3
1 1 1
Implemented In progress Not started

Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers

National Agency on Corruption Prevention

100%
1

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine

0%
1

Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine

0%
1

Summarized general information on Measures

Name of the measure The main implementer Co-implementors Performance indicator Monitoring results (latest) Статус
1 2.1.7.3.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to institute a periodic external independent assessment (audit) of the performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office, which will be carried out by reputed international experts proposed by international and foreign organizations that have provided international technical assistance to Ukraine in matters of preventing and combating corruption National Agency on Corruption Prevention Міністерство юстиції України, Національне антикорупційне бюро The draft law has been submitted to the Parliament of Ukraine.
The measure was implemented on time and in full
Implemented
2 2.1.7.3.2 Arranging an external independent assessment (audit) of the performance of the National Anticorruption Bureau and publicizing a report on its findings at intervals prescribed by the law Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine The assessment has been conducted at intervals prescribed by the law, and the report on the findings of each assessment has been publicized.
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
In progress
3 2.1.7.3.3 Arranging an external independent assessment (audit) of the performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office and publicizing a report on its findings at intervals prescribed by the law Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine Міністерство закордонних справ України The assessment has been conducted at intervals prescribed by the law, and the report on the findings of each assessment has been publicized.
Implementation of the measure has not started
Not started

Indicators of achievement of ESR

Total number of indicators – 3

Indicators fully achieved – 0

Partially achieved indicators – 0

Indicators with a score of 0% – 3

Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators

Indicators Weight (%)
1 A law has taken effect, which stipulates that external independent evaluation (audit) of the performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office carried out by reputed international experts proposed by international and foreign organizations that have provided international technical assistance to Ukraine in matters of preventing and combating corruption, shall be conducted in the month immediately following a period of two years after publication of the findings of the previous evaluation. 50%
2 In each case prescribed by law, an external independent evaluation (audit) of performance has been conducted in respect of:
a) the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine (20 percent);
b) the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office (20 percent);
40%
3 at least 70 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate:
a) each completed external independent evaluation (audit) of performance of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine as being impartial and unbiased (2.5. percent);
b) each completed external independent evaluation (audit) of performance of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine as being complete and all-encompassing (2.5. percent);
c) each completed external independent evaluation (audit) of performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office as being impartial and unbiased (2.5. percent);
d) each completed external independent evaluation (audit) of performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office as being complete and all-encompassing (2.5. percent).
10%

Key sources of assessment:

Additional sources of information: