ESR
2.1.7.3. An effective mechanism for conducting an independent evaluation (audit) of the performance of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office has been introduced
Problem solving:
2.1.7. The need to improve the process of independent evaluation of the performance of anticorruption agencies and develop mechanisms for holding them liable
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.01.2024 -
30.11.2024
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
3
1
2
Implemented
Not started
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
100%
1
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine
0%
1
Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine
0%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 3
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 3
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A law has taken effect, which stipulates that external independent evaluation (audit) of the performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office carried out by reputed international experts proposed by international and foreign organizations that have provided international technical assistance to Ukraine in matters of preventing and combating corruption, shall be conducted in the month immediately following a period of two years after publication of the findings of the previous evaluation. | 50% |
| 2 |
In each case prescribed by law, an external independent evaluation (audit) of performance has been conducted in respect of: a) the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine (20 percent); b) the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office (20 percent); |
40% |
| 3 |
at least 70 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate: a) each completed external independent evaluation (audit) of performance of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine as being impartial and unbiased (2.5. percent); b) each completed external independent evaluation (audit) of performance of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine as being complete and all-encompassing (2.5. percent); c) each completed external independent evaluation (audit) of performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office as being impartial and unbiased (2.5. percent); d) each completed external independent evaluation (audit) of performance of the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office as being complete and all-encompassing (2.5. percent). |
10% |