ESR
2.2.5.2.
The legislation obligates the Antimonopoly Committee to publish on its official website:
recommendations issued to government agencies, local self-government bodies, organizations, business entities, associations;
the complete list of cases being examined by the Antimonopoly Committee along with the regularly updated details of each case involving a violation of the requirements of legislation on the protection of economic competition, specifically the gist of the case, the general stages of examination
Problem solving:
2.2.5. Insufficient information about the activities of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine and the fact that it is vested with a number of discretionary powers complicate public control over its activities and cause a high level of corruption risks. There is no effective program to mitigate the liability of cartel members who have reported the cartel and provided evidence.
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
Summarized general information on Measures
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 2
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 2
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
the law has taken effect, which stipulates: a) the obligation of the Antimonopoly Committee to publish on its official website within the time frame prescribed by this law the recommendations (other than classified information) issued to government agencies, local self-government bodies, organizations, business entities, associations (14 percent); b) the obligation of the Antimonopoly Committee and its territorial offices to publish on its official website within the time frame prescribed by this law the complete list of cases being examined by the Antimonopoly Committee along with the regularly updated details of each case involving a violation of the requirements of legislation on the protection of economic competition, specifically the gist of the case, the relevant state commissioner, the examination time frame, the general stages of examination, and the grounds for prolonging the term of examination of the case (14 percent); c) the obligation of the Antimonopoly Committee and its territorial offices to publish on its official website within the time frame prescribed by this law the texts of clarifications adopted and issued by the Antimonopoly Committee (14 percent); d) the obligation of the Antimonopoly Committee and its territorial offices to publish on its official website within the time frame prescribed by this law the information about the proposed concentrations (the names and legal form of organization of the parties to the concentration, the nature of the proposed actions) (14 percent); e) the obligation of the Antimonopoly Committee and its territorial offices to publish on its official website within the time frame prescribed by this law the unified open State Register of Business Entities Held Accountable for Committing a Violation in the Form of Concerted Anticompetitive Actions Involving the Distortion of the Outcomes of Competitive Bidding Processes (14 percent). |
70% |
| 2 |
the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that: a) more than 75 percent of experts on the regulation of the economy and business evaluate the quality of legal regulation implemented pursuant to subclause 1 of clause 2.2.5.2 as high or very high (30 percent); b) more than 50 percent of experts on the regulation of the economy and business evaluate the quality of legal regulation implemented pursuant to subclause 1 of clause 2.2.5.2 as high or very high (20 percent); c) more than 25 percent of experts on the regulation of the economy and business evaluate the quality of legal regulation implemented pursuant to subclause 1 of clause 2.2.5.2 as high or very high (10 percent). |
30% |