State regulation of the economy

2.2. State regulation of the economy

problems 7
expected strategic
results 24
measures 139
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 15.10.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.06.2024
22 15 40 29 33
139
Implemented Partially implemented In progress Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 37 ( 26.6%)
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
Problems
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — % evaluation of achievement of ESR —
2.2.1. Failure to implement the digital transformation of the exercise of powers by government agencies and local self-government bodies as a basis for ensuring transparency and minimizing corruption risks in their activities
16.7%
18
ESR 2.2.1.1.
27.3%
ESR 2.2.1.2.
0%
2.2.2. Arbitrary application of mandatory rules for businesses, which is accompanied by attendant corruption risks
32.3%
65
ESR 2.2.2.1.
25%
ESR 2.2.2.2.
60.9%
ESR 2.2.2.3.
0%
ESR 2.2.2.4.
42.9%
ESR 2.2.2.5.
0%
2.2.3. Excessive and unjustified regulatory burden on businesses, which contributes to a high level of corruption in this sector
23.1%
26
ESR 2.2.3.1.
0%
ESR 2.2.3.2.
0%
ESR 2.2.3.3.
60%
ESR 2.2.3.4.
33.3%
ESR 2.2.3.5.
0%
ESR 2.2.3.6.
50%
ESR 2.2.3.7.
50%
2.2.4. Ineffective government regulation, which hinders the growth of honest businesses and fosters corrupt practices
26.1%
23
ESR 2.2.4.1.
28.6%
ESR 2.2.4.2.
50%
ESR 2.2.4.3.
0%
ESR 2.2.4.4.
0%
2.2.5. Insufficient information about the activities of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine and the fact that it is vested with a number of discretionary powers complicate public control over its activities and cause a high level of corruption risks. There is no effective program to mitigate the liability of cartel members who have reported the cartel and provided evidence.
25%
4
ESR 2.2.5.1.
0%
ESR 2.2.5.2.
0%
ESR 2.2.5.3.
0%
ESR 2.2.5.4.
100%
2.2.6. A significant number of administrators of government aid for business entities provide government aid that is illegal and has been recognized by the Antimonopoly Committee as inadmissible for competition, which has a negative impact on competition and may stem from prior corrupt arrangements.
0%
2
ESR 2.2.6.1.
0%
2.2.7. The ineffective mechanism of preliminary inspection and assessment of the impact on competition during the establishment and operation of business entities causes a negative impact on competition.
0%
1
ESR 2.2.7.1.
0%