Feedback from the public

ESR

2.3.1.5. When developing and implementing measures towards prevention of corruption in the customs authorities, effective cooperation with the public and business associations has been established, as well as regular monitoring of the work of the customs authorities through periodic surveys of entrepreneurs and customs officers

Problem solving:

2.3.1. Insufficient transparency and effectiveness of customs authorities, excessive discretionary powers of customs officers

Deadlines for all measures within ESR

01.03.2023 - 31.12.2025

Implementation of SACP measures within ESR

Total number of measures – 6
2 2 2
Implemented In progress Not started

Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers

State Customs Service of Ukraine

33.3%
6

Summarized general information on Measures

Name of the measure The main implementer Co-implementors Performance indicator Monitoring results (latest) Статус
1 2.3.1.5.1 Conducting an assessment of corruption risks with the mandatory involvement of the public, particularly anticorruption NGOs and business associations State Customs Service of Ukraine The report on the findings of risk assessment has been published.
The measure was implemented on time and in full
Implemented
2 2.3.1.5.2 Drafting the anticorruption program of the State Customs Service with the mandatory involvement of the public, particularly anticorruption NGOs and business associations, and coordinating it with the public council State Customs Service of Ukraine The anticorruption program has been approved.
The measure was implemented on time and in full
Implemented
3 2.3.1.5.3 Implementing the activities prescribed by the anticorruption program indicated in subclause 2.3.1.5.2, as well as other measures towards the prevention of corruption in the customs authorities, with the mandatory involvement of the public, particularly business associations and the public council at the State Customs Service State Customs Service of Ukraine The anticorruption program has been implemented.
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
In progress
4 2.3.1.5.4 Annual publication of information on the results of involvement of anticorruption NGOs and representatives of the business community State Customs Service of Ukraine The list of proposals of the public for the anticorruption programs, which have been considered or rejected (with a substantiation of the reasons for the rejection), and the results of activities conducted during the implementation of the anticorruption program carried out with the participation of the public and representatives of the business community have been made public.
There is no progress in the implementation of the measure
In progress
5 2.3.1.5.5 Annual independent anonymous survey of customs officials conducted by the public council at the State Customs Service on the performance of the customs authorities, the problematic aspects of their work, and ways to resolve the existing problems State Customs Service of Ukraine The annual survey has been conducted and its findings have been publicized.
Implementation of the measure has not started
Not started
6 2.3.1.5.6 Annual survey of business community representatives conducted by business associations and the public council at the State Customs Service to explore the effectiveness of their cooperation with the customs authorities, the problems encountered during their interaction, and ways to resolve them State Customs Service of Ukraine The annual survey has been conducted and its findings have been publicized.
Implementation of the measure has not started
Not started

Indicators of achievement of ESR

Total number of indicators – 4

Indicators fully achieved – 0

Partially achieved indicators – 0

Indicators with a score of 0% – 4

Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators

Indicators Weight (%)
1 The State Customs Service annually publishes information about the results of engagement of anticorruption NGOs and representatives of the business community, including the list of proposals of the public for the anticorruption programs, which have been considered or rejected (with a substantiation of the reasons for the rejection), and the list and results of activities conducted during the implementation of the anticorruption program carried out with the participation of the public and representatives of the business community. 30%
2 Beginning with 2024, a report is annually published on the results of the annual independent anonymous survey of customs officials conducted by the public council at the State Customs Service on the performance of the customs authorities, the problematic aspects of their work, and ways to resolve the existing problems. 30%
3 Beginning with 2024, a report is annually published on the results of the annual survey of business community representatives conducted by business associations and the public council at the State Customs Service to explore the effectiveness of their cooperation with the customs authorities, the problems encountered during their interaction, and ways to resolve them. 30%
4 the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that:
a) more than 75 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of cooperation between the State Customs Service and the community and business associations in developing and implementing measures towards prevention of corruptions in customs authorities as high or very high (10 percent);
b) more than 50 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of cooperation between the State Customs Service and the community and business associations in developing and implementing measures towards prevention of corruptions in customs authorities as high or very high (7 percent);
c) more than 25 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of cooperation between the State Customs Service and the community and business associations in developing and implementing measures towards prevention of corruptions in customs authorities as high or very high (4 percent).
10%

Key sources of assessment:

Additional sources of information: