ESR
2.3.3.2. The mechanism for bringing customs officials to disciplinary liability (including dismissal) is effective and transparent
Problem solving:
2.3.3. Flawed procedure for filing administrative appeals against actions of customs officials
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.03.2023 -
31.12.2025
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
4
1
3
Implemented
In progress
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
State Customs Service of Ukraine
25%
4
Summarized general information on Measures
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 3
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 3
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
№ | Indicators | Weight (%) |
---|---|---|
1 |
An organizational administrative act of the State Customs Service has been approved, which: a) obligates the State Customs Service to publish on a quarterly basis the results of the work of disciplinary committees formed at the State Customs Service and in the customs authorities, in a breakdown by customs authorities, the number of cases examined, the kinds of recommended decisions, the number and kinds of decisions made by officials to impose a disciplinary penalty on a civil servant or discontinue the disciplinary proceeding (25 percent); b) obligates the State Customs Service to conduct annual monitoring of the results of review of disciplinary complaints against actions officials and other employees of the customs authorities, followed by publication and public discussion of the results of such monitoring (25 percent); |
50% |
2 | The results of the work of disciplinary committees and the results of monitoring of the outcomes of review of disciplinary complaints against actions of officials and other employees of the customs authorities have been published, a public discussion of the results of such monitoring has been held within the timeframe prescribed by the act indicated in subclause 1 of clause 2.3.3.2. | 40% |
3 |
the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that: a) more than 75 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanism used to impose disciplinary liability on officials and other employees of the customs authorities as high or very high (10 percent); b) more than 50 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanism used to impose disciplinary liability on officials and other employees of the customs authorities as high or very high (7 percent); c) more than 25 percent of experts on customs policy evaluate the effectiveness of the mechanism used to impose disciplinary liability on officials and other employees of the customs authorities as high or very high (4 percent). |
10% |