ESR
3.3.3.10. Cases of money laundering and assets obtained through corruption are detected and duly document owing to the effective work of the State Financial Monitoring Service and the regulatory framework governing its cooperation with the National Agency, the National Anticorruption Bureau, the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor's Office, ARMA, and other government agencies
Problem solving:
3.3.3. The legislation governing the activity of the ARMA contains numerous gaps and corruption risks. Low effectiveness of the processes of transferring assets to ARMA for management to preserve their economic value, as well as the processes of combating and preventing money laundering
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
State Financial Monitoring Service of Ukraine
Summarized general information on Measures
| № | Name of the measure | The main implementer | Co-implementors | Performance indicator | Monitoring results (latest) | Статус |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3.3.10.1 Launching the information and telecommunications system “Electronic Workspace of the Financial Monitoring System” | State Financial Monitoring Service of Ukraine |
The software has been developed. The hardware required for the operation of the electronic system has been deployed. |
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 2
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 2
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | An system for secure electronic data exchange between the SFMS, reporting entities, and entities subject to state financial monitoring has been introduced. | 50% |
| 2 |
at least 80 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate: a) the activities of the SFMS as completely or generally effective (15 percent); b) the cooperation between the SFMS and the prosecutorial agencies and the pretrial investigation authorities as completely or generally effective (15 percent); c) the cooperation between the SFMS and ARMA as completely or generally effective (10 percent); d) the cooperation between the SFMS and the National Agency as completely or generally effective (10 percent). |
50% |