Feedback from the public

ESR

3.3.4.2. The substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court has been narrowed down through an increase in the scale of the object of the crime or the harm caused by it

Problem solving:

3.3.4. The overall progress of court hearings involving corruption and corruption-related criminal offenses is slow. There is no established practice of consideration of criminal proceedings in this category. There are numerous cases of abuse of procedural rights by litigants

Deadlines for all measures within ESR

01.11.2023 - 31.03.2024

Implementation of SACP measures within ESR

Total number of measures – 2
2
Implemented

Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers

Ministry of Justice of Ukraine

100%
2

Summarized general information on Measures

Name of the measure The main implementer Co-implementors Performance indicator Monitoring results (latest) Статус
1 3.3.4.2.1 Preparing an analytical report on the feasibility of continued narrowing down of the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court through an increase in the scale of the object of the crime or the harm caused by it Ministry of Justice of Ukraine The analytical report has been prepared and made public.
The measure was not implemented on time and in full
Implemented
2 3.3.4.2.2 Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, coordinators of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community Ministry of Justice of Ukraine The conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report have been discussed with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, coordinators of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community.
The measure was implemented on time and in full
Implemented

Indicators of achievement of ESR

Total number of indicators – 2

Indicators fully achieved – 0

Partially achieved indicators – 0

Indicators with a score of 0% – 2

Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators

Indicators Weight (%)
1 An analytical report on the expediency of continued narrowing down of the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court through an increase in the scale of the object of the crime or the harm caused by it has been prepared and made public. 50%
2 at least 80 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the legal policy evaluate:
a) the substantive jurisdiction of the High Anticorruption Court as fully optimal or mostly optimal (25 percent);
b) the level of workload of judges of the High Anticorruption Court as optimal or mostly optimal (25 percent).
50%

Key sources of assessment:

Additional sources of information: