ESR
3.3.2.2. The system of electronic criminal proceedings has been introduced
Problem solving:
3.3.2. Poor efficiency and quality of pretrial investigation of corruption and corruption-related criminal offenses (a significant number of such proceedings last for years) is due to excessive complexity of certain procedural formalities
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.03.2023 -
28.02.2024
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
15
4
2
9
Implemented
Not implemented
Not started
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine
80%
5
Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine
0%
2
National School of Judges of Ukraine
0%
2
Prosecutor`s Training Center of Ukraine
0%
2
State Bureau of Investigation
0%
1
Economic Security Bureau of Ukraine
0%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
| № | Name of the measure | The main implementer | Co-implementors | Performance indicator | Monitoring results (latest) | Статус |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3.2.2.1 Integrating the iCase system used by the National Anticorruption Bureau and the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office with the Unified Register of Pretrial Investigations | National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine | Офіс Генерального прокурора | The iCase system has been integrated with the Unified Register of Pretrial Investigations. |
The measure was not implemented on time and in full
|
|
| 2 | 3.3.2.2.2 Integrating the iCase system used by the National Anticorruption Bureau and the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office with the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System or a different system used pursuant to Article 35 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine at the High Anticorruption Court | National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine | Вищий антикорупційний суд, Державна судова адміністрація України, Офіс Генерального прокурора | The iCase system has been integrated with the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System or a different system used pursuant to Article 35 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine at the High Anticorruption Court, which ensures data exchange in the requisite volumes. |
The measure was not implemented on time and in full
|
|
| 3 | 3.3.2.2.3 Commencing the use of the iCase system at the High Anticorruption Court | National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine | Вищий антикорупційний суд, Державна судова адміністрація України, Офіс Генерального прокурора | The order to commence the use of the iCase system at the High Anticorruption Court has been issued. |
The measure was not implemented on time and in full
|
|
| 4 | 3.3.2.2.4 The iCase system is used to access the materials of criminal proceedings pursuant to Articles 221 and 290 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine. | National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine | Офіс Генерального прокурора | The technical capability to access the materials of criminal proceedings pursuant to Articles 221 and 290 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine via the iCase system has been implemented. |
The measure was not implemented on time and in full
|
|
| 5 | 3.3.2.2.5 Improving the iCase system taking into account the experience of its usage in the activities of the National Anticorruption Bureau, the Specialized Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office, and the High Anticorruption Court, and the need to ensure that it is used by all prosecutorial authorities and pretrial investigation authorities in each criminal proceeding | Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine | Національна поліція України, Вища рада правосуддя, Державна судова адміністрація України, Державне бюро розслідувань, Національне антикорупційне бюро, Служба безпеки України, Рада суддів України, Бюро економічної безпеки України | There is technical capability to ensure that the iCase system is used by all prosecutorial authorities and pretrial investigation authorities in each criminal proceeding. |
The measure has not been implemented
|
|
| 6 | 3.3.2.2.6 Developing and approving the Operating Procedure of the Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System, which is used by all prosecutorial authorities and pretrial investigation authorities in each criminal proceeding | Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine | Національна поліція України, Вища рада правосуддя, Державна судова адміністрація України, Державне бюро розслідувань, Національне антикорупційне бюро, Служба безпеки України, Рада суддів України, Бюро економічної безпеки України | The Operating Procedure of the Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System, which is used by all prosecutorial authorities and pretrial investigation authorities in each criminal proceeding, has taken effect. |
The measure has not been implemented
|
|
| 7 | 3.3.2.2.7 (1) Preparing informational and explanatory materials on the use of the Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System in criminal proceedings | National School of Judges of Ukraine | Informational and explanatory materials have been prepared and made public (on training and communications platforms). | |||
| 8 | 3.3.2.2.7 (2) Preparing informational and explanatory materials on the use of the Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System in criminal proceedings | Prosecutor`s Training Center of Ukraine | Informational and explanatory materials have been prepared and made public (on training and communications platforms). | |||
| 9 | 3.3.2.2.8 (1) Holding training activities (trainings or remote courses) for judges, prosecutors, and investigators on using the Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System | National School of Judges of Ukraine | At least 10 trainings have been held for judges, prosecutors, and investigators, each attended by at least 25 individuals, and/or a remote course focusing on this topic has been completed by at least 1,000 individuals. | |||
| 10 | 3.3.2.2.8 (2) Holding training activities (trainings or remote courses) for judges, prosecutors, and investigators on using the Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System | Prosecutor`s Training Center of Ukraine | At least 10 trainings have been held for judges, prosecutors, and investigators, each attended by at least 25 individuals, and/or a remote course focusing on this topic has been completed by at least 1,000 individuals. | |||
| 11 | 3.3.2.2.8 (3) Holding training activities (trainings or remote courses) for judges, prosecutors, and investigators on using the Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System | National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine | At least 10 trainings have been held for judges, prosecutors, and investigators, each attended by at least 25 individuals, and/or a remote course focusing on this topic has been completed by at least 1,000 individuals. | |||
| 12 | 3.3.2.2.8 (4) Holding training activities (trainings or remote courses) for judges, prosecutors, and investigators on using the Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System | State Bureau of Investigation | At least 10 trainings have been held for judges, prosecutors, and investigators, each attended by at least 25 individuals, and/or a remote course focusing on this topic has been completed by at least 1,000 individuals. |
Implementation of the measure has not started
|
||
| 13 | 3.3.2.2.8 (5) Holding training activities (trainings or remote courses) for judges, prosecutors, and investigators on using the Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System | Economic Security Bureau of Ukraine | At least 10 trainings have been held for judges, prosecutors, and investigators, each attended by at least 25 individuals, and/or a remote course focusing on this topic has been completed by at least 1,000 individuals. |
Implementation of the measure has not started
|
||
| 14 | 3.3.2.2.8 (6) Holding training activities (trainings or remote courses) for judges, prosecutors, and investigators on using the Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System | Security Service of Ukraine | At least 10 trainings have been held for judges, prosecutors, and investigators, each attended by at least 25 individuals, and/or a remote course focusing on this topic has been completed by at least 1,000 individuals. | |||
| 15 | 3.3.2.2.8 (7) Holding training activities (trainings or remote courses) for judges, prosecutors, and investigators on using the Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System | National Police of Ukraine | At least 10 trainings have been held for judges, prosecutors, and investigators, each attended by at least 25 individuals, and/or a remote course focusing on this topic has been completed by at least 1,000 individuals. |
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 4
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 4
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Operating Procedure of the Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System has come into force, which is used by all pretrial investigation authorities. | 40% |
| 2 | The Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System is fully used in practice in 100 percent of criminal proceedings. | 40% |
| 3 |
The Pretrial Investigation Information and Telecommunication System is fully integrated and supports full data exchange with the appropriate level of security with: a) the Unified Register of Pretrial Investigations (5 percent); b) the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System (and/or other system operating in accordance with Article 35 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine) (5 percent). |
10% |
| 4 |
at least 80 percent of experts on the activities of law enforcement and prosecutorial authorities evaluate that the electronic criminal proceeding system: a) is used to the full extent in all criminal proceedings (5 percent); b) contains all the essential functions that are required at the stages of pretrial investigation and court proceedings for parties to the proceedings (3 percent); c) is sufficiently integrated with other essential information and communication systems or registers (2 percent). |
10% |