ESR
1.3.1.1. The legislative definitions of the terms "real conflict of interest", "potential conflict of interest", and "private interest" have been clarified to simplify their understanding and application.
Problem solving:
1.3.1. Flaws of legislation and the lack of effective risk-based mechanisms for detecting conflicts of interest limit the ability to minimize corruption by preventing and resolving conflicts of interest.
Deadlines for all measures within ESR
01.03.2023 -
31.08.2023
Implementation of SACP measures within ESR
Total number of measures –
1
1
Partially implemented
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
100%
1
Summarized general information on Measures
| № | Name of the measure | The main implementer | Co-implementors | Performance indicator | Monitoring results (latest) | Статус |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3.1.1.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law that proposing to introduce a new approach to defining the terms “potential conflicts of interest” and “real conflict of interest”, which makes it possible to clearly differentiate between the two concepts (specifically by updating or modifying such an attribute as the conflict between a private interest and official duties), refine the concept of “private interest”, and introduce the definition of the concept of “public interest” | National Agency on Corruption Prevention | The draft law has been submitted to the Parliament of Ukraine. |
The measure was implemented late and partially
|
Indicators of achievement of ESR
Total number of indicators – 2
Indicators fully achieved – 0
Partially achieved indicators – 0
Indicators with a score of 0% – 2
Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators
| № | Indicators | Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
The law has taken effect, which: a) introduces a new approach to defining the terms “potential conflict of interest” and “real conflict of interest”, which makes it possible to clearly segregate them (in particular, such an attribute as conflict between private interests and official powers has been clarified or modified) (70 percent); b) the concept of “private interest” has been improved, particularly by adding more clarity to the definition of this concept, and the definition of the concept of “public interest” has been introduced (20 percent); |
90% |
| 2 |
the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that: a) more than 75 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of measures indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.1.1 as high or very high (10 percent); b) more than 50 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of measures indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.1.1 as high or very high (6 percent); c) more than 25 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of measures indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.1.1 as high or very high (3 percent). |
10% |