Feedback from the public

ESR

1.3.1.1. The legislative definitions of the terms "real conflict of interest", "potential conflict of interest", and "private interest" have been clarified to simplify their understanding and application.

Problem solving:

1.3.1. Flaws of legislation and the lack of effective risk-based mechanisms for detecting conflicts of interest limit the ability to minimize corruption by preventing and resolving conflicts of interest.

Deadlines for all measures within ESR

01.03.2023 - 31.08.2023

Implementation of SACP measures within ESR

Total number of measures – 1
1
Partially implemented

Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers

National Agency on Corruption Prevention

100%
1

Summarized general information on Measures

Indicators of achievement of ESR

Total number of indicators – 2

Indicators fully achieved – 0

Partially achieved indicators – 0

Indicators with a score of 0% – 2

Оцінка досягнення ОСР - 0%

Рівень досягнення ОСР - низький

Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators

* - Вага - програмне значення індикатора в ОСР
Indicators Weight* (%) Assessment of achievement Evaluation rationale Data source/information manager
for the year 2024 for the year 2025
1 The law has taken effect, which:
a) introduces a new approach to defining the terms “potential conflict of interest” and “real conflict of interest”, which makes it possible to clearly segregate them (in particular, such an attribute as conflict between private interests and official powers has been clarified or modified) (70 percent);
b) the concept of “private interest” has been improved, particularly by adding more clarity to the definition of this concept, and the definition of the concept of “public interest” has been introduced (20 percent);
90% 0% Official printed publications
Official website of the Parliament of Ukraine
2 the results of the expert survey have demonstrated that:
a) more than 75 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of measures indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.1.1 as high or very high (10 percent);
b) more than 50 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of measures indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.1.1 as high or very high (6 percent);
c) more than 25 percent of experts on the formulation and implementation of the anticorruption policy evaluate the quality of measures indicated in subclause 1 of clause 1.3.1.1 as high or very high (3 percent).
10% 0% Results of the expert survey organized by the National Agency

Key sources of assessment:

Additional sources of information: