Feedback from the public

ESR

1.4.2.2. Declarants spend less time when filling out declarations and make fewer mistakes when entering information, particularly owing to the updated declaration form and the ability to automatically migrate specific details from other state registers into the declaration

Problem solving:

1.4.2. The process of submitting information to the Unified State Register of Declarations of Officials Authorized to Carry out Functions of State or Local Self-Government is cumbersome due to insufficient awareness of declarants about the requirements on how to fill out the declarations; Recurrent problems in the operation of this Register, flawed legislation

Deadlines for all measures within ESR

01.03.2023 - 31.12.2025

Implementation of SACP measures within ESR

Total number of measures – 4
1 1 2
In progress Not implemented Not started

Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers

National Agency on Corruption Prevention

0%
3

Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine

0%
1

Summarized general information on Measures

№ Name of the measure The main implementer Co-implementors Performance indicator Monitoring results (latest) Статус
1 1.4.2.2.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to provide a more detailed wording of the provisions in Article 46 of the Law and optimize the list of information that must be declared National Agency on Corruption Prevention Міністерство юстиції України The draft law has been submitted to the Parliament of Ukraine.
The measure has not been implemented
Not implemented
2 1.4.2.2.2 Ensuring technical compatibility (interoperability) between state (public) electronic registers that includes, inter alia:
1) publishing a plan of implementation of unrealized functionality, eliminating any discrepancies between registers, making changes to subsequent stages of the registers (both user-end changes and business process changes);
2) implementing recommendations regarding the rollout of missing functionality that is prescribed by normative legal acts;
3) unifying the methodology of creation, maintenance, administration, registration, interoperation, and discontinuation of registers;
4) ensuring format-based verification and compatibility of data;
5) using unified directories for all registers, which would make it possible to unify data across registers and subsequently reduce the number of incompatibility incidents;
6) developing and updating detailed documentation pertaining to all components of the register and methods of their interoperation, which would make it possible to optimize the training of employees and reduce the time it takes register improvement and maintenance service providers to become acquainted with the operating principles of the register;
7) creating a directory of errors encountered in each register separately, as not all errors displayed by registers have clear descriptions, which would also make it possible to consider them when migrating to new technologies;
8) improving the legislative framework of each register separately and minimizing the opportunities of manipulations with the “Other” field, given the possibility to compile a clear list of registers that do not contain this field;
9) implementing the procedure of regular analysis of incidents and technical support requests by register users, which would make it possible to clearly formulate the paths of register improvements, implement additional tools for communication between technical administrators and users via email and other channels for reporting errors;
10) migrating data from older electronic registers to existing data registers using a standardized structure of the relevant fields, digitizing hardcopy archives, and entering their data into state registers, while simultaneously ensuring format-based compatibility of data
11) ensuring the population of the core state registers with data. 		Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine Міністерство юстиції України, Державна податкова служба України, Державна служба України з питань геодезії, картографії та кадастру, Національне агентство з питань запобігання корупції, Міністерство розвитку громад та територій України, Міністерство внутрішніх справ України The study has confirmed the interaction and technical compatibility (interoperability) among state registers.
There is progress in the implementation of the measure
In progress
3 1.4.2.2.3 Conducting a study of the interaction and technical compatibility (interoperability) between the Unified State Register of Declarations of Officials Authorized to Carry out Functions of State or Local Self-Government and other core state registers, which includes:
1) surveying external and internal users of state registers;
2) identifying the causes of insufficient compatibility of the Unified State Register of Declarations of Officials Authorized to Carry out Functions of State or Local Self-Government;
3) formulating recommendations on how to eliminate the detected causes of insufficient compatibility of registers. 		National Agency on Corruption Prevention Міністерство цифрової трансформації України The study of the Register is being used by stakeholders tasked with developing national interoperability. Not started
4 1.4.2.2.4 Implementing the elements of a system that automatically fills the declaration with specific details by employing the interoperability among state (public) electronic registers of Ukraine National Agency on Corruption Prevention The declaration autofill system is functioning. Not started

Indicators of achievement of ESR

Total number of indicators – 4

Indicators fully achieved – 0

Partially achieved indicators – 0

Indicators with a score of 0% – 4

Summarized general information about Achievement Indicators

№ Indicators Weight (%)
1 Interoperability between core state (public) electronic registers of Ukraine has been ensured:
a) The level of interoperability encompasses 2/3 of state (public) electronic registers (50 percent);
b) The level of interoperability encompasses 1/2 of state (public) electronic registers (30 percent);
c) The level of interoperability encompasses 1/3 of state (public) electronic registers (20 percent). 		50%
2 A report on the interaction and technical compatibility (interoperability) between the Unified State Register of Declarations of Officials Authorized to Carry out Functions of State or Local Self-Government and other core state register has been published. 10%
3 Elements of automatic migration of specific details from core state registers into the declaration have been implemented. 25%
4 A law has taken effect, which has revised and optimized the list of information that must be declared. 15%

Key sources of assessment:

Additional sources of information: