Problem
3.2.1. Some of the rules, prohibitions, and restrictions established by anticorruption legislation are not backed up by legal liability measures. Articles 1724—1729, 21215, 21221 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses contain a number of shortcomings that significantly impair their injunctive and preventive potential as well as the effectiveness of the National Agency, the National Police, prosecutorial authorities and courts.
General information about the problem
Some of the rules, prohibitions and restrictions established by the anticorruption legislation are not currently backed by legal liability measures, which leads to a low level of compliance in practice. This primarily concerns the requirements concerning the handover of enterprises and corporate rights to third parties for management, prohibitions and restrictions applicable to individuals who have stopped performing functions of state or local self-government, as well as requirements that mandate taking steps to resolve a real or potential conflict of interest.
The torts mentioned in Articles 1729-1 and 1729-2 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses were mistakenly attributed to administrative offenses related to corruption.
Articles 1724 – 1729 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses contain flaws that significantly impair their injunctive and deterrent (preventive) potential as well as the effectiveness of the National Agency, the National Police, prosecutorial authorities and courts in this area.
The provisions of Articles21215, 21221 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses are not fully consistent with the provisions of the Law of Ukraine On Political Parties in Ukraine and the Election Code of Ukraine. There are conflicts between these articles and Article 1591 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which significantly complicate the correct classification of these offenses and results in numerous mistakes in practice. Sanctions for such administrative offenses are too lenient.
The torts mentioned in Articles 1729-1 and 1729-2 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses were mistakenly attributed to administrative offenses related to corruption.
Articles 1724 – 1729 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses contain flaws that significantly impair their injunctive and deterrent (preventive) potential as well as the effectiveness of the National Agency, the National Police, prosecutorial authorities and courts in this area.
The provisions of Articles21215, 21221 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses are not fully consistent with the provisions of the Law of Ukraine On Political Parties in Ukraine and the Election Code of Ukraine. There are conflicts between these articles and Article 1591 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, which significantly complicate the correct classification of these offenses and results in numerous mistakes in practice. Sanctions for such administrative offenses are too lenient.
Expand...
Implementation of SACP measures within the limits of the problem
The total number of OSR –
4
All measures of the SACP
measures, the implementation of which as of
30.09.2024
is about to begin
to be completed
1
4
4
9
In progress
Not implemented
Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 0 (0%)
Deadlines for all measures
01.07.2023 -
31.12.2025
Implementation of SACP measures within the scope of the Problem by main main performers
National Agency on Corruption Prevention
6
National Police of Ukraine
1
Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine
1
Supreme Court
1
Achievement of ESR within the limits of the Problem
The total number of OSR – 4