Shaping and implementing the state anticorruption policy

1.1. Shaping and implementing the state anticorruption policy

problems 5
expected strategic
results 19
measures 170
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 22.02.2025
measures, the implementation of which as of 31.12.2024
41 10 61 13 45
170
Implemented Partially implemented In progress Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 51 ( 30%)
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
Problems
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — % evaluation of achievement of ESR —
1.1.1. The state anticorruption policy is not always based on complete, objective, and reliable data; The efforts of different government agencies, local self-government bodies, and the public are not sufficiently coordinated
38.5%
91
ESR 1.1.1.1.
33.3%
ESR 1.1.1.2.
10%
ESR 1.1.1.3.
50%
ESR 1.1.1.4.
66.7%
ESR 1.1.1.5.
55.3%
ESR 1.1.1.6.
71.4%
ESR 1.1.1.7.
7.1%
ESR 1.1.1.8.
0%
1.1.2. Unsystematic amendments to anticorruption legislation adversely impact the effectiveness of enforcement of the law
50%
2
ESR 1.1.2.1.
100%
ESR 1.1.2.2.
0%
1.1.3. Provisions of normative legal acts and their drafts need to be further improved in order to eliminate potential factors that foster corruption
8.8%
34
ESR 1.1.3.1.
100%
ESR 1.1.3.2.
16.7%
ESR 1.1.3.3.
3.7%
1.1.4. The institution of authorized anticorruption units (officers) does not fully realize its potential due to insufficient guarantees of autonomy
16%
25
ESR 1.1.4.1.
18.8%
ESR 1.1.4.2.
20%
ESR 1.1.4.3.
0%
1.1.5. In many areas of social life, resorting to corrupt practices is a more convenient, efficient, effective, and sometimes only way to satisfy the needs of individuals or legal entities compared to satisfying such needs in the legitimate way
44.4%
18
ESR 1.1.5.1.
55.6%
ESR 1.1.5.2.
33.3%
ESR 1.1.5.3.
33.3%