Shaping and implementing the state anticorruption policy

1.1. Shaping and implementing the state anticorruption policy

problems 5
expected strategic
results 19
measures 166
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 28.02.2026
84 21 41
146
Implemented Partially implemented Not implemented
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 105 (71.9%)
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
Selected filters:
Measures to be enforceable
Clean the filter
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
Problems
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — evaluation of achievement of ESR, % —
1.1.1. The state anticorruption policy is not always based on complete, objective, and reliable data; The efforts of different government agencies, local self-government bodies, and the public are not sufficiently coordinated
71.9%
89
ESR 1.1.1.1.
100%
ESR 1.1.1.2.
100%
ESR 1.1.1.3.
62.5%
ESR 1.1.1.4.
100%
ESR 1.1.1.5.
75%
ESR 1.1.1.6.
100%
ESR 1.1.1.7.
57.1%
ESR 1.1.1.8.
12.5%
1.1.2. Unsystematic amendments to anticorruption legislation adversely impact the effectiveness of enforcement of the law
100%
2
ESR 1.1.2.1.
100%
ESR 1.1.2.2.
100%
1.1.3. Provisions of normative legal acts and their drafts need to be further improved in order to eliminate potential factors that foster corruption
34.4%
32
ESR 1.1.3.1.
100%
ESR 1.1.3.2.
33.3%
ESR 1.1.3.3.
32%
1.1.4. The institution of authorized anticorruption units (officers) does not fully realize its potential due to insufficient guarantees of autonomy
44%
25
ESR 1.1.4.1.
31.3%
ESR 1.1.4.2.
100%
ESR 1.1.4.3.
25%
1.1.5. In many areas of social life, resorting to corrupt practices is a more convenient, efficient, effective, and sometimes only way to satisfy the needs of individuals or legal entities compared to satisfying such needs in the legitimate way
94.4%
18
ESR 1.1.5.1.
88.9%
ESR 1.1.5.2.
100%
ESR 1.1.5.3.
100%