Shaping and implementing the state anticorruption policy

1.1. Shaping and implementing the state anticorruption policy

problems 5
expected strategic
results 19
measures 189
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 21.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
48 7 60 24 50
189
Implemented Partially implemented In progress Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 55 ( 29.1%)
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
Problems
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — % evaluation of achievement of ESR —
1.1.1. The state anticorruption policy is not always based on complete, objective, and reliable data; The efforts of different government agencies, local self-government bodies, and the public are not sufficiently coordinated
39%
105
ESR 1.1.1.1.
33.3%
ESR 1.1.1.2.
10%
ESR 1.1.1.3.
62.5%
ESR 1.1.1.4.
100%
ESR 1.1.1.5.
50%
ESR 1.1.1.6.
55.6%
ESR 1.1.1.7.
7.1%
ESR 1.1.1.8.
0%
1.1.2. Unsystematic amendments to anticorruption legislation adversely impact the effectiveness of enforcement of the law
50%
2
ESR 1.1.2.1.
100%
ESR 1.1.2.2.
0%
1.1.3. Provisions of normative legal acts and their drafts need to be further improved in order to eliminate potential factors that foster corruption
8.6%
35
ESR 1.1.3.1.
50%
ESR 1.1.3.2.
16.7%
ESR 1.1.3.3.
3.7%
1.1.4. The institution of authorized anticorruption units (officers) does not fully realize its potential due to insufficient guarantees of autonomy
14.8%
27
ESR 1.1.4.1.
18.8%
ESR 1.1.4.2.
20%
ESR 1.1.4.3.
0%
1.1.5. In many areas of social life, resorting to corrupt practices is a more convenient, efficient, effective, and sometimes only way to satisfy the needs of individuals or legal entities compared to satisfying such needs in the legitimate way
30%
20
ESR 1.1.5.1.
55.6%
ESR 1.1.5.2.
0%
ESR 1.1.5.3.
33.3%