Administrative liability

3.2. Administrative liability

problems 2
expected strategic
results 6
measures 13
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 21.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
3 6 4
13
In progress Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 0 ( 0%)
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
Problems
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — % evaluation of achievement of ESR —
3.2.1. Some of the rules, prohibitions, and restrictions established by anticorruption legislation are not backed up by legal liability measures. Articles 1724—1729, 21215, 21221 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses contain a number of shortcomings that significantly impair their injunctive and preventive potential as well as the effectiveness of the National Agency, the National Police, prosecutorial authorities and courts.
0%
9
ESR 3.2.1.1.
0%
ESR 3.2.1.2.
0%
ESR 3.2.1.3.
0%
ESR 3.2.1.4.
0%
3.2.2. The majority of individuals guilty of corruption-related offenses as well as offenses in matters relating to the funding of political parties and submission of financial statements by political parties avoid administrative liability and/or penalties by exploiting systemic loopholes in the existing system for holding individuals administratively accountable as well as the flaws of the judicial system.
0%
4
ESR 3.2.2.1.
0%
ESR 3.2.2.2.
0%