Ensuring the integrity of political parties and election campaigns

1.5. Ensuring the integrity of political parties and election campaigns

problems 3
expected strategic
results 14
measures 27
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 14.11.2025
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.06.2025
5 1 4 5 12
27
Implemented Partially implemented In progress Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 6 (22.2%)
Qualitative level of achievement of ESR
1 1 7.1%
High
2 14.3%
Middle
11 78.6%
Low
 
Average evaluation of achievement of ESR, %
14.6
%
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
Problems
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — evaluation of achievement of ESR, % —
1.5.1. The cumbersome and nontransparent mechanism by which parties are formed, operated, and terminated
25%
8
8.0
%
ESR 1.5.1.1.
0%
0.0%
ESR 1.5.1.2.
0%
0.0%
ESR 1.5.1.3.
0%
0.0%
ESR 1.5.1.4.
50%
0.0%
ESR 1.5.1.5.
100%
40.0%
1.5.2. Excessive influence on political parties and election campaigns by specific individuals and legal entities leads to the prevalence of private interests over public ones in representative bodies
33.3%
3
0.0
%
ESR 1.5.2.1.
100%
0.0%
ESR 1.5.2.2.
0%
0.0%
ESR 1.5.2.3.
0%
0.0%
ESR 1.5.2.4.
0%
0.0%
1.5.3. The system for monitoring the funding of activities of political parties and the funding of their participation in elections needs improving
17.6%
17
32.8
%
ESR 1.5.3.1.
0%
20.0%
ESR 1.5.3.2.
75%
40.0%
ESR 1.5.3.3.
0%
4.0%
ESR 1.5.3.4.
0%
100%
ESR 1.5.3.5.
0%
0.0%