State regulation of the economy

2.2. State regulation of the economy

problems 7
expected strategic
results 24
measures 114
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 19.02.2026
measures, the implementation of which as of 31.12.2025
53 28 26 7
114
Implemented Partially implemented Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 81 (71.1%)
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
Problems
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — evaluation of achievement of ESR, % —
2.2.1. Failure to implement the digital transformation of the exercise of powers by government agencies and local self-government bodies as a basis for ensuring transparency and minimizing corruption risks in their activities
100%
8
ESR 2.2.1.1.
100%
ESR 2.2.1.2.
100%
2.2.2. Arbitrary application of mandatory rules for businesses, which is accompanied by attendant corruption risks
60.4%
53
ESR 2.2.2.1.
50%
ESR 2.2.2.2.
100%
ESR 2.2.2.3.
42.9%
ESR 2.2.2.4.
90.9%
ESR 2.2.2.5.
0%
2.2.3. Excessive and unjustified regulatory burden on businesses, which contributes to a high level of corruption in this sector
68%
25
ESR 2.2.3.1.
50%
ESR 2.2.3.2.
25%
ESR 2.2.3.3.
100%
ESR 2.2.3.4.
33.3%
ESR 2.2.3.5.
100%
ESR 2.2.3.6.
50%
ESR 2.2.3.7.
100%
2.2.4. Ineffective government regulation, which hinders the growth of honest businesses and fosters corrupt practices
85.7%
21
ESR 2.2.4.1.
83.3%
ESR 2.2.4.2.
87.5%
ESR 2.2.4.3.
80%
ESR 2.2.4.4.
100%
2.2.5. Insufficient information about the activities of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine and the fact that it is vested with a number of discretionary powers complicate public control over its activities and cause a high level of corruption risks. There is no effective program to mitigate the liability of cartel members who have reported the cartel and provided evidence.
100%
4
ESR 2.2.5.1.
100%
ESR 2.2.5.2.
100%
ESR 2.2.5.3.
100%
ESR 2.2.5.4.
100%
2.2.6. A significant number of administrators of government aid for business entities provide government aid that is illegal and has been recognized by the Antimonopoly Committee as inadmissible for competition, which has a negative impact on competition and may stem from prior corrupt arrangements.
100%
2
ESR 2.2.6.1.
100%
2.2.7. The ineffective mechanism of preliminary inspection and assessment of the impact on competition during the establishment and operation of business entities causes a negative impact on competition.
0%
1
ESR 2.2.7.1.
0%