State regulation of the economy

2.2. State regulation of the economy

problems 7
expected strategic
results 24
measures 119
Progress in the implementation of measures as of 01.09.2025
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.06.2025
38 15 30 9 27
119
Implemented Partially implemented In progress Not implemented Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 53 (44.5%)
Якісний рівень досягнення ОСР
1 3 12.5%
High
5 20.8%
Middle
16 66.7%
Low
 
Середня оцінка досягнення ОСР, %
24.1
%
Convenient search for measures
Display in tabular form
the diagrams above show the share (%) of completed measures (fully and partially)
Problems
% of measures implemented — % of measures partially implemented — evaluation of achievement of ESR, % —
2.2.1. Failure to implement the digital transformation of the exercise of powers by government agencies and local self-government bodies as a basis for ensuring transparency and minimizing corruption risks in their activities
87.5%
8
1.5
%
ESR 2.2.1.1.
100%
0.0%
ESR 2.2.1.2.
0%
3.0%
2.2.2. Arbitrary application of mandatory rules for businesses, which is accompanied by attendant corruption risks
31%
58
17.2
%
ESR 2.2.2.1.
0%
0.0%
ESR 2.2.2.2.
60%
40.0%
ESR 2.2.2.3.
0%
12.0%
ESR 2.2.2.4.
54.5%
34.0%
ESR 2.2.2.5.
0%
0.0%
2.2.3. Excessive and unjustified regulatory burden on businesses, which contributes to a high level of corruption in this sector
44%
25
32.9
%
ESR 2.2.3.1.
25%
0.0%
ESR 2.2.3.2.
0%
0.0%
ESR 2.2.3.3.
80%
100%
ESR 2.2.3.4.
33.3%
0.0%
ESR 2.2.3.5.
60%
60.0%
ESR 2.2.3.6.
50%
0.0%
ESR 2.2.3.7.
50%
70.0%
2.2.4. Ineffective government regulation, which hinders the growth of honest businesses and fosters corrupt practices
52.4%
21
26.0
%
ESR 2.2.4.1.
50%
11.0%
ESR 2.2.4.2.
87.5%
0.0%
ESR 2.2.4.3.
0%
27.0%
ESR 2.2.4.4.
50%
66.0%
2.2.5. Insufficient information about the activities of the Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine and the fact that it is vested with a number of discretionary powers complicate public control over its activities and cause a high level of corruption risks. There is no effective program to mitigate the liability of cartel members who have reported the cartel and provided evidence.
100%
4
39.0
%
ESR 2.2.5.1.
100%
17.0%
ESR 2.2.5.2.
100%
49.0%
ESR 2.2.5.3.
100%
20.0%
ESR 2.2.5.4.
100%
70.0%
2.2.6. A significant number of administrators of government aid for business entities provide government aid that is illegal and has been recognized by the Antimonopoly Committee as inadmissible for competition, which has a negative impact on competition and may stem from prior corrupt arrangements.
100%
2
0.0
%
ESR 2.2.6.1.
100%
0.0%
2.2.7. The ineffective mechanism of preliminary inspection and assessment of the impact on competition during the establishment and operation of business entities causes a negative impact on competition.
0%
1
0.0
%
ESR 2.2.7.1.
0%
0.0%