Progress in the implementation of measures as of
22.12.2024
2 |
28.6%
4 |
57.1%
1 |
14.3%
7
Implemented
In progress
Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) -
2 (
28.6%)
Measures —
7
2.1.2.4.1.
Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law that:
1) mandates the publication by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine of the results of examinations during the assessment of qualifications of judges (while safeguarding the personal data);
2) defines the concept and key characteristics of a professional profile of a judge.
The main implementer:
Ministry of Justice of Ukraine
2.1.2.4.2.
Developing the draft professional profile of a judge
The main implementer:
Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
2.1.2.4.3.
Holding consultations with the participation of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, NGOs, and other stakeholders on the draft professional profile of a judge, obtaining expert opinions, and revising the draft
The main implementer:
Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
2.1.2.4.4.
Approving and publicizing the revised professional profile of a judge
The main implementer:
Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
2.1.2.4.5.
Developing the draft of detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures
The main implementer:
Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
2.1.2.4.6.
Holding consultations with the participation of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, NGOs, and other stakeholders on the draft of detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures, obtaining expert opinions, and revising the draft
The main implementer:
Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
2.1.2.4.7.
Approving the revised detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures, and publicizing them
The main implementer:
Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine
Indicators —
4
Evaluation of achievement of ESR —
indicator weight —
1
набрав чинності закон, яким:
а) встановлено обов’язкове оприлюднення Вищою кваліфікаційною комісією суддів України результатів іспитів під час кваліфікаційного оцінювання суддів (із забезпеченням захисту персональних даних)
(30 відсотків)
2
The professional profile of a judge:
a) has been developed by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (6 percent);
b) has been revised following consultations with the High Council of Justice, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and NGOs (6 percent);
c) has been approved by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (6 percent);
d) has been made public (6 percent);
e) is constantly applied in practice, in particular, when determining detailed methodologies for scoring during the selection of judges and evaluation of qualifications (6 percent).
3
Detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures:
a) have been developed taking into account the professional profile of a judge defined by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (6 percent);
b) have been revised following consultations with the High Council of Justice, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and NGOs (6 percent);
c) have been approved by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine (6 percent);
d) have been made public (6 percent);
e) are being constantly used in procedures of selection of judges and evaluation of qualifications (6 percent).
4
at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that:
a) the detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures, which are used in practice, fully or for the most part ensure the appropriate balance between objective and subjective evaluation criteria (5 percent);
b) the detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures are systematically used by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine in all judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures (5 percent).
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)