SUMMARIZED GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM MEASURES IN TERMS OF DIRECTIONS, PROBLEMS AND EXPECTED STRATEGIC RESULTS

ESR: 2.1.2.4. An objective and transparent methodology for scoring and determining the results by members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine and the High Council of Justice when making decisions in the selection, evaluation, and promotion of judges, as well as for publishing information on the examinations, has been introduced

Progress in the implementation of measures as of 24.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
1 4 2
7
Implemented Partially implemented Not implemented
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 5 ( 71.4%)
Download the table
№ Name of the ESR Name of the measure The main implementer Monitoring results (latest) Status % of measures implemented (fully and partially) Evaluation of achievement of ESR Середній рівень ОСР
Direction 2.1. Fair courts, prosecutorial and law enforcement authorities
71.4% 5 / 7
0.0%
Problem 2.1.2. Procedures for qualification evaluation of judges and competitive selection procedures need to be improved and clear and predictable criteria (indicators) of integrity and professional ethics should be developed. Integrity and professional ethics as standard requirements for judges are not sufficiently implemented in practice, and the evaluation of conformity to these requirements is not always transparent and predictable
71.4% 5 / 7
0.0%
4.1 ОСР 2.1.2.4. An objective and transparent methodology for scoring and determining the results by members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine and the High Council of Justice when making decisions in the selection, evaluation, and promotion of judges, as well as for publishing information on the examinations, has been introduced 2.1.2.4.1 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law that: 1) mandates the publication by the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine of the results of examinations during the assessment of qualifications of judges (while safeguarding the personal data); 2) defines the concept and key characteristics of a professional profile of a judge. Ministry of Justice of Ukraine The measure was implemented on time, but partially Partially implemented
71.4% 5 / 7
0.0%
4.2 2.1.2.4.2 Developing the draft professional profile of a judge Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine The measure was not implemented on time and in full Implemented
4.3 2.1.2.4.3 Holding consultations with the participation of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, NGOs, and other stakeholders on the draft professional profile of a judge, obtaining expert opinions, and revising the draft Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine The measure has not been implemented Not implemented
4.4 2.1.2.4.4 Approving and publicizing the revised professional profile of a judge Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine The measure has not been implemented Not implemented
4.5 2.1.2.4.5 Developing the draft of detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine The measure was implemented late and partially Partially implemented
4.6 2.1.2.4.6 Holding consultations with the participation of the High Council of Justice, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Public Council on Integrity, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, NGOs, and other stakeholders on the draft of detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures, obtaining expert opinions, and revising the draft Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine The measure was implemented late and partially Partially implemented
4.7 2.1.2.4.7 Approving the revised detailed methods of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine for the scoring of judges (candidates for the position of a judge) at each stage of judge selection and qualification evaluation procedures, and publicizing them Higher Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine The measure was implemented late and partially Partially implemented