SUMMARIZED GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM MEASURES IN TERMS OF DIRECTIONS, PROBLEMS AND EXPECTED STRATEGIC RESULTS

ESR: 2.1.4.2. E-justice has been ensured, in particular by enabling the online consideration of certain categories of cases regardless of the location of the parties and the court, which, in particular, contributes to the even allocation of cases among courts and judges

Progress in the implementation of measures as of 21.11.2024
measures, the implementation of which as of 30.09.2024
2 1 1 4
8
Implemented Partially implemented In progress Not implemented
Measures implemented (fully and partially) - 3 ( 37.5%)
Download the table
№ Name of the ESR Name of the measure The main implementer Monitoring results (latest) Status % of measures implemented (fully and partially) Evaluation of achievement of ESR Середній рівень ОСР
Direction 2.1. Fair courts, prosecutorial and law enforcement authorities
37.5% 3 / 8
0.0%
Problem 2.1.4. Presence of corruption risks attributable to gaps and flaws of legislation in the system of justice
37.5% 3 / 8
0.0%
2.1 ОСР 2.1.4.2. E-justice has been ensured, in particular by enabling the online consideration of certain categories of cases regardless of the location of the parties and the court, which, in particular, contributes to the even allocation of cases among courts and judges 2.1.4.2.1 Preparing and publicizing an analytical report with recommendations on determining the categories of cases that can be examined online irrespective of the location of the parties and the court Ministry of Justice of Ukraine The measure was implemented on time and in full Implemented
37.5% 3 / 8
0.0%
2.2 2.1.4.2.2 Discussing the conclusions and recommendations outlined in the analytical report with the participation of representatives of government agencies, NGOs, international organizations, participants of international technical assistance projects, and the academic community Ministry of Justice of Ukraine The measure was implemented on time and in full Implemented
2.3 2.1.4.2.3 Drafting and submitting to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine a draft law proposing to provide for online judicial examination irrespective of the location of the parties and the court for specific categories of cases, according to the recommendations outlined in the analytical report indicated in subclause 2.1.4.2.1 Ministry of Justice of Ukraine The measure was implemented on time, but partially Partially implemented
2.4 2.1.4.2.4 Conducting an audit of the current status of information technologies in courts, as well as assessing the degree to which they align with the current tasks of the justice system. The audit should produce an assessment of the current IT solutions in accordance with best international practices and bearing in mind the cost effectiveness of the existing infrastructure, as well as the recommendations regarding the continued development and transformation of the architecture of IT systems of the judiciary. State Judicial Administration of Ukraine The measure has not been implemented Not implemented
2.5 2.1.4.2.5 Hiring an independent expert organization to assess the result of the spending of funds on the creation and improvement of services and modules of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System State Judicial Administration of Ukraine The measure has not been implemented Not implemented
2.6 2.1.4.2.6 Developing and approving the functional requirements for the implementation of the full functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System (continued improvement of services and modules) State Judicial Administration of Ukraine The measure has not been implemented Not implemented
2.7 2.1.4.2.7 Developing software and deploying hardware required for the implementation of the full functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System with the involvement of vendors / contractors selected through competitive and transparent public procurement processes (including the expansion of the functionality of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System as mandated by provisions of procedural legislation and to provide courts with IT equipment (server, network, and computer hardware, particularly scanners) State Judicial Administration of Ukraine There is progress in the implementation of the measure In progress
2.8 2.1.4.2.8 Developing and approving the Regulation on the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System, which would define the procedure for the operation and usage of all subsystems (modules) High Council of Justice The measure has not been implemented Not implemented