Progress in the implementation of measures as of
21.11.2024
2 |
28.6%
1 |
14.3%
2 |
28.6%
2 |
28.6%
7
Partially implemented
In progress
Not implemented
Not started
Measures implemented (fully and partially) -
2 (
28.6%)
Measures —
7
2.1.4.5.1.
Conducting activities of state external financial control (audit) over the spending of state budget funds on the administration of justice by local courts and courts of appeal and the functioning of agencies and institutions of the justice system, including in matters of the allocation of financial and economic resources for courts and judicial authorities, management of state-owned properties controlled by the State Judicial Administration (SJA), supporting the creation and operation of specific subsystems (modules) of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System
The main implementer:
Accounting Chamber of Ukraine
2.1.4.5.2.
Drafting standards of staffing, funding, logistics, and supply of other resources for courts
The main implementer:
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
2.1.4.5.3.
Holding consultations on the draft standards of staffing, funding, logistics, and supply of other resources for courts with the participation of the High Council of Justice, the State Judicial Administration, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, judges, NGOs, international organizations, and participants of international technical assistance projects; obtaining expert opinions
The main implementer:
High Council of Justice
2.1.4.5.4.
Revising and approving the standards of staffing, funding, logistics, and supply of other resources for courts, and publicizing them
The main implementer:
High Council of Justice
2.1.4.5.5.
Drafting the Regulation on transparent planning and allocation of budget resources in the judicial system based on objective and clearly defined criteria, particularly taking into account the standards of staffing, funding, logistics, and supply of other resources for courts
The main implementer:
State Judicial Administration of Ukraine
2.1.4.5.6.
Holding consultations on the draft Regulation on transparent planning and allocation of budget resources in the judicial system based on objective and clearly defined criteria with the participation of the High Council of Justice, the State Judicial Administration, the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, judges, NGOs, international organizations, and participants of international technical assistance projects; obtaining expert opinions
The main implementer:
High Council of Justice
2.1.4.5.7.
Revising and approving the Regulation on transparent planning and allocation of budget resources in the judicial system based on objective and clearly defined criteria, and publicizing it
The main implementer:
High Council of Justice
Indicators —
5
Evaluation of achievement of ESR —
indicator weight —
1
Standards of staffing, funding, logistics, and supply of other resources for courts have been approved and are used.
2
The regulations on transparent planning and allocation of budget resources in the judicial system based on objective and clearly defined criteria, particularly taking into account the standards of staffing, funding, logistics, and supply of other resources for courts have been approved and are used.
3
The results of activities of state external financial control (audit) over the spending of state budget funds on the administration of justice by local courts and courts of appeal and the functioning of agencies and institutions of the justice system, including in matters of the allocation of financial and economic resources for courts and judicial authorities, management of state-owned properties controlled by the State Judicial Administration (SJA), supporting the creation and operation of specific subsystems (modules) of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System have been approved and made public.
4
At least 90 percent of recommendations (proposals) issued on the basis of the results of activities of state external financial control (audit) over the spending of state budget funds on the administration of justice by local courts and courts of appeal and the functioning of agencies and institutions of the justice system, including in matters of the allocation of financial and economic resources for courts and judicial authorities, management of state-owned properties controlled by the State Judicial Administration (SJA), supporting the creation and operation of specific subsystems (modules) of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System have been implemented.
5
at least 80 percent of justice experts estimate that:
a) the regulation on transparent planning and allocation of budget resources in the judicial system are based on objective and clearly defined criteria, particularly taking into account the standards of staffing, funding, logistics, and supply of other resources for courts (5 percent);
b) the regulations on transparent planning and allocation of budget resources in the judicial system based on objective and clearly defined criteria are all-encompassing and regulate all of the relevant issues (5 percent);
c) the findings of the audit of State Judicial Administration activities at the very least cover the issues of the effectiveness of spending of funds on supplying financial and economic resources for courts and the judicial authorities, and the management of state properties controlled by the State Judicial Administration (5 percent);
d) the recommendations based on the findings of the audit of State Judicial Administration activities have been implemented by at least 90 percent (5 percent).
* - certain measures are common to several ESRs, but have a separate number (id)